This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 2000 Apr;14(4):317.

doi: 10.1007/s004640000153.

Are radially dilating trocars better than the alternatives?

PMID: 10790546
DOI: 10.1007/s004640000153

Review

Are radially dilating trocars better than the alternatives?

K N Apelgren. Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr.

. 2000 Apr;14(4):317.

doi: 10.1007/s004640000153.

Author

PMID: 10790546
DOI: 10.1007/s004640000153

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Radially dilating trocars are not cost-effective alternatives except for pediatric laparoscopic operations, especially those for undescended testis and imperforate anus.
Ng WT, Chang D. Ng WT, et al. Surg Endosc. 2001 Apr;15(4):424-5. doi: 10.1007/s004640080123. Epub 2001 Mar 13. Surg Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11395831 No abstract available.
Are radially dilating trocars better than alternatives?
Motson RW. Motson RW. Surg Endosc. 2001 Sep;15(9):1052. doi: 10.1007/s004640090013. Epub 2001 Jul 5. Surg Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11605117 No abstract available.

References

1. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Mar;188(3):337-8 - PubMed
1. Surg Endosc. 1994 Jun;8(6):689-91 - PubMed
1. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996 Aug;3(4):609-15 - PubMed
1. Surg Endosc. 1998 Dec;12(12):1434-8 - PubMed
1. Urology. 1999 Oct;54(4):727-9 - PubMed

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Springer