Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Apr;25(2):95-112.
doi: 10.1023/a:1005125506642.

Decision-making in HIV prevention community planning: an integrative review

Affiliations
Review

Decision-making in HIV prevention community planning: an integrative review

A P Johnson-Masotti et al. J Community Health. 2000 Apr.

Abstract

Since 1994, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has required that the 65 health department grantees that receive funding for HIV prevention interventions engage in a community planning process to involve affected communities in local prevention decision making; to increase the use of epidemiological data to target HIV prevention resources; and to ensure that the planning process takes into account scientific information on the effectiveness and efficiency of different HIV interventions. Local community planning groups are charged with identifying and prioritizing unmet HIV prevention needs in their communities, as well as prioritizing prevention interventions designed to address these needs. Their recommendations, in turn, form the basis for the local health department's request for HIV prevention funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Given the community planning process's central role in the allocation of federal HIV prevention funds, it is critical that sound decision-making procedures inform this process. In this article, we review the basics of the community planning prioritization process and summarize the decision-making experiences of community planning groups across the US. We then describe several priority-setting tools and decision analytic models that have been developed to assist in HIV community planning prioritization and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we offer suggestions for improving the decision-analytic basis for HIV prevention community planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Community Health. 1995 Apr;20(2):87-100 - PubMed
    1. Public Health Rep. 1996;111 Suppl 1:108-14 - PubMed
    1. AIDS. 1994 Oct;8(10 ):1371-89 - PubMed
    1. AIDS Public Policy J. 1998 Fall;13(3):115-27 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:467-88 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources