Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence
- PMID: 10795227
Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence
Similar articles
-
Randomised controlled trials for chronic illness management research - where's the tipping point?J Clin Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(7B):147-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02475.x. J Clin Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18578788 Review. No abstract available.
-
A critical approach to evidence provided through clinical trials.Nurs Times. 2006 Sep 5-11;102(36):36-8. Nurs Times. 2006. PMID: 16986593 Review.
-
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98. Health Technol Assess. 1999. PMID: 10374081 Review. No abstract available.
-
Discussion of paper by Korn and Freidlin.Am J Bioeth. 2011 Mar;11(3):13-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.546480. Am J Bioeth. 2011. PMID: 21400376 No abstract available.
-
Consort 2010 statement on randomised controlled trials.Ir Med J. 2010 May;103(5):132. Ir Med J. 2010. PMID: 20666080 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcomes with alternative dosing strategies for piperacillin/tazobactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2015 Jan 9;10(1):e0116769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116769. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25575030 Free PMC article.