Amnioinfusion for umbilical cord compression in labour
- PMID: 10796084
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000013
Amnioinfusion for umbilical cord compression in labour
Update in
-
Amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000013.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22258939 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Amnioinfusion aims to prevent or relieve umbilical cord compression during labour by infusing a solution into the uterine cavity.
Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of amnioinfusion on maternal and perinatal outcome for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression or potential amnionitis.
Search strategy: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched.
Selection criteria: Randomised trials of amnioinfusion compared with no amnioinfusion in women with babies at risk of umbilical cord compression; and women at risk of intrauterine infection.
Data collection and analysis: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by the reviewer.
Main results: Twelve studies were included. Transcervical amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression was associated with the following reductions: fetal heart rate decelerations (relative risk 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.68); caesarean section for suspected fetal distress (relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.52); neonatal hospital stay greater than 3 days (relative risk 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0. 26 to 0.62); maternal hospital stay greater than 3 days (relative risk 0.46, 95% 0.29 to 0.74). Transabdominal amnioinfusion showed similar results. Transcervical amnioinfusion to prevent infection in women with membranes ruptured for more than 6 hours was associated with a reduction in puerperal infection (relative risk 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.97).
Reviewer's conclusions: Amnioinfusion appears to reduce the occurrence of variable heart rate decelerations and lower the use of caesarean section. However the studies were done in settings where fetal distress was not confirmed by fetal blood sampling. The results may therefore only be relevant where caesarean sections are commonly done for abnormal fetal heart rate alone. The trials reviewed are too small to address the possibility of rare but serious maternal adverse effects of amnioinfusion.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
