Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000;1998(2):CD001084.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001084.

Pharmacotherapy for Behcet's syndrome

Affiliations

Pharmacotherapy for Behcet's syndrome

A Saenz et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effects of available pharmacological interventions in treating the different clinical features of Behcet's syndrome.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and Medline up to January 1998. The computer search was complemented by a hand search of all bibliographic references from the reference lists of included trials. Principal investigators were contacted to seek unpublished literature. All languages were included.

Selection criteria: Studies were eligible if they fulfilled all of the four following criteria: 1. Randomized controlled trials, single or double-blind; 2. Participants were patients with Behcet's Syndrome as defined by the International Study Group, 1990 (Int Study Group, 1990); 3. Interventions included any pharmacological therapy compared to placebo or some other pharmacological intervention for the treatment of Behcet's syndrome. 4. Outcome measures included active ocular inflammatory processes, arthritis, mucocutaneous manifestations (oral ulcer, genital ulcer, erythema nodosum), laboratory changes and major events such as adverse effects and death.

Data collection and analysis: The 32 potentially relevant references were assessed by two independent reviewers (MA, AS) according to the inclusion criteria. Ten trials fit the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. From the 10 included trials, data were independently extracted by the same two observers and crosschecked. The quality of the included trials was assessed independently by two observers (MA, AS) using a validated scale (Jadad 1996). For dichotomous measures, the treatment effect for each trial was calculated using a fixed effect model [Peto model (Petitti 1994)]. The weighted mean differences were based, if available, on end-of-trial results. The analysis was conducted separately for each different intervention. Since the trials could not be pooled it was not possible to carry out a sensitivity analysis by quality scores or a subgroup analysis by drug dosages. Because of this lack of comparability across trials and the small number of trials, we could not conduct a heterogeneity test or a funnel plot.

Main results: Ten trials and 679 patients were included. The main results were the lack of efficacy of some of the classic treatments for Behcet's syndrome, including colchicine, cyclophosphamide and steroids for eye involvement, azapropazone and colchicine for arthritis and acyclovir, colchicine and topical interpheron for aphthas. The results confirm the protective effects of cyclosporine and azathioprine for eye involvement and benzathine-penicillin for arthritis.

Reviewer's conclusions: We conclude that further randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials should be carried out to compare cyclosporine, azathioprine and benzathine-penicillin versus placebo in order to make the results generalizable and comparable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azathioprine vs Placebo. No previous eye involvement., Outcome 1 Necessitating withdrawal.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azathioprine vs Placebo. No previous eye involvement., Outcome 2 New eye disease.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azathioprine vs Placebo. No previous eye involvement., Outcome 3 Hypopyon uveitis.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azathioprine vs Placebo. No previous eye involvement., Outcome 4 Pulsed intravenous corticosteroid treatment.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azathioprine vs Placebo. No previous eye involvement., Outcome 5 Oral corticosteroid treatment.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Azathioprine vs Placebo. Previous eye involvement., Outcome 1 Necessitating withdrawal..
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Azathioprine vs Placebo. Previous eye involvement., Outcome 2 New eye disease..
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Azathioprine vs Placebo. Previous eye involvement., Outcome 3 Involvement of previously unaffected eye..
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Azathioprine vs Placebo. Previous eye involvement., Outcome 4 Hypopyon uveitis.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Azathioprine vs Placebo. Previous eye involvement., Outcome 5 Pulsed intravenous corticosteroid treatment..
2.6
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 Azathioprine vs Placebo. Previous eye involvement., Outcome 6 Oral Corticosteroid treatment..
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Azathioprine vs placebo, Outcome 1 Visual acuity [first minus last visit] mean sd.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Azathioprine vs placebo, Outcome 2 GI side effects.
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 Azathioprine vs placebo, Outcome 3 Low WCC (<4,000/ml).
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Azathioprine vs placebo, Outcome 4 IV steroids neccessity.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 1 Incidence of arthritis episodes.
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 2 Patients with arthritis episodes.
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 3 Mean of arthritis episodes per patient.
4.4
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 4 Duration of episode.
4.5
4.5. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 5 Severe arthritis attacks.
4.6
4.6. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 6 Polyarticular joint involvement.
4.7
4.7. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 7 Prednisone dosage/day.
4.8
4.8. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 8 Prednisone duration/days.
4.9
4.9. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 9 Duration of arthritis episode‐free period.
4.10
4.10. Analysis
Comparison 4 Colchicine plus Benzathine Penicillin vs Colchicine. Arthritis, Outcome 10 Colchicine gastro‐intestinal side effects..
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Topical alpha interpheron vs placebo, Outcome 1 New oral ulcers (per group).
5.2
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 Topical alpha interpheron vs placebo, Outcome 2 Total oral ulcers (per patient).
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 1 Persistence of arthritis.
6.2
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 2 New arthritis.
6.3
6.3. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 3 Duration of arthritis (mean±sd days).
6.4
6.4. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 4 Joint swelling day 7.
6.5
6.5. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 5 Joint swelling day 21.
6.6
6.6. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 6 Tender joint score 7.
6.7
6.7. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 7 Tender joint score 21.
6.8
6.8. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 8 Visual analogue scale for pain day 7.
6.9
6.9. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 9 Visual analogue score for pain day 21.
6.10
6.10. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 10 Mean C reactive protein (mg/dl) day 21.
6.11
6.11. Analysis
Comparison 6 Azaproprazone vs placebo, Outcome 11 Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate day 21.
7.1
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7 Cyclosporine vs cyclophosphamide, Outcome 1 Visual acuity.
7.2
7.2. Analysis
Comparison 7 Cyclosporine vs cyclophosphamide, Outcome 2 Number of ocular attacks/patient/month up to 6 months..
7.3
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7 Cyclosporine vs cyclophosphamide, Outcome 3 Number of ocular attacks/patient/month from 6 months to unmasking..
8.1
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8 Autologous salive vs placebo, Outcome 1 Oral aphtas improvement.
8.2
8.2. Analysis
Comparison 8 Autologous salive vs placebo, Outcome 2 Genital aphtas improvement.
8.3
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8 Autologous salive vs placebo, Outcome 3 Arthritis improvement.
9.1
9.1. Analysis
Comparison 9 Cyclosporine vs conventional therapy., Outcome 1 Drop‐outs due to severe eye involvement.
9.2
9.2. Analysis
Comparison 9 Cyclosporine vs conventional therapy., Outcome 2 Visual acuity at 1st month.
9.3
9.3. Analysis
Comparison 9 Cyclosporine vs conventional therapy., Outcome 3 Visual acuity at 24 month.
9.4
9.4. Analysis
Comparison 9 Cyclosporine vs conventional therapy., Outcome 4 Mouth ulcers: 0‐24 months.
9.5
9.5. Analysis
Comparison 9 Cyclosporine vs conventional therapy., Outcome 5 Genital ulcers:0‐24 months.
10.1
10.1. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 1 Aphtas not improved.
10.2
10.2. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 2 Eye not improved.
10.3
10.3. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 3 Genital ulcers not improved.
10.4
10.4. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 4 Erythema nodosum not improved.
10.5
10.5. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 5 Pyoderma not improved.
10.6
10.6. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 6 Arthritis not improved.
10.7
10.7. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 7 Arthralgia not improved.
10.8
10.8. Analysis
Comparison 10 Colchicine vs placebo, Outcome 8 Bilateral eye involvement.
11.1
11.1. Analysis
Comparison 11 Cyclosporine vs Colchicine, Outcome 1 Ocular attacks frequency:not improvemed.
11.2
11.2. Analysis
Comparison 11 Cyclosporine vs Colchicine, Outcome 2 Ocular attacks severity:not improved.
11.3
11.3. Analysis
Comparison 11 Cyclosporine vs Colchicine, Outcome 3 Dermal lesions not improved.
11.4
11.4. Analysis
Comparison 11 Cyclosporine vs Colchicine, Outcome 4 Aphtas not improved.
11.5
11.5. Analysis
Comparison 11 Cyclosporine vs Colchicine, Outcome 5 Clinical symptoms aggravated.
12.1
12.1. Analysis
Comparison 12 Acyclovir vs placebo., Outcome 1 Frequency new oral ulcers..
12.2
12.2. Analysis
Comparison 12 Acyclovir vs placebo., Outcome 2 Frequency new genital ulcers..
12.3
12.3. Analysis
Comparison 12 Acyclovir vs placebo., Outcome 3 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate mm/h..
12.4
12.4. Analysis
Comparison 12 Acyclovir vs placebo., Outcome 4 Hemoglobine g/dl..
12.5
12.5. Analysis
Comparison 12 Acyclovir vs placebo., Outcome 5 White cell count, 10*9/l..
12.6
12.6. Analysis
Comparison 12 Acyclovir vs placebo., Outcome 6 Inmunoglobulin G, g/l..

References

References to studies included in this review

Aktulga 1980 {published data only}
    1. Aktulga E, Altac M, Muftuoglu A, Ozyazgan Y, Pazarli H, Tuzun Y, et al. A double blind study of colchicine in behcet's disease. Haematologica (Pavia) 1980;65:399‐402. - PubMed
Benamour 1991 {published data only}
    1. Benamour S, Bennis R, Messoudi M, Zaoui A, Amor B. Desensibilisation a la salive autologue et maladie de Behcet. Rev Med Interne 1991;12:339‐342. - PubMed
Benezra 1988 {published data only}
    1. BenEzra D, Cohen E, Chajek T, Friedman G, Pizanti S, Courten C de, et al. Evaluation of conventional therapy versus cyclosporine A in Behcet's Syndrome. Transplantation Proceedings 1988;20(3):136‐143. - PubMed
Calguneri 1996a {published data only}
    1. Calguneri M (a), Kiraz S, Ertenli I, Benekli M, Karaarslan Y, Celik I. The effect of prophylactic penicillin treatment on the course of arthritis episodes in patients with behcet's disease. A randomized clinical trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1996;39:2062‐2065. - PubMed
Davies 1988 {published data only}
    1. Davies UM, Palmer RG, Denman AM. Treatment with acyclovir does not affect orogenital ulcers in Behcet's syndrome: a randomized double‐blind trial. British Journal of Rheumatology 1988;27:300‐302. - PubMed
Hamuryudan 1991 {published data only}
    1. Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Rosenkaimer F, Yazici H. Inefficacy of topical alpha interferon in the treatment of oral ulcers of Behcet's syndrome: a randomized, double blind trial [letter]. British Journal of Rheumatology 1991;30:395‐396. - PubMed
Masuda 1989 {published data only}
    1. Masuda K, Nakajima A, Urayama A, Nakae K, Kogure M, Inaba G. Double‐masked trial of cyclosporin versus colchicine and long‐term open study of cyclosporin in Behcet's disease. Lancet 1989;1:1093‐1096. - PubMed
Moral 1995 {published data only}
    1. Moral F, Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Yacizi H. Inefficacy of azapropazone in the acute arthritis of Behcet's syndrome: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology 1995;13:493‐495. - PubMed
Oryazgan 1992 {published data only}
    1. Ozyazgan Y, Yurdakul S, Yacizi H, Tuzun B, Iscimen A, Tuzun Y, et al. Low dose cyclosporin A versus pulsed cyclophosphamide in Behcet's syndrome: a single masked trial. British Journal of Ophtalmology 1992;76:241‐243. - PMC - PubMed
Yacizi 1990 {published data only}
    1. Yacizi H, Pazarli H, Barnes CG, Tuzun Y, Ozyazgan Y, Silman A, et al. A controlled trial of azathioprine in Behcet's syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 1990;322:281‐285. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Abdalla 1973 {published data only}
    1. Abdalla MI. Long‐lasting remission of Behcet's disease after chlorambucil therapy. Br‐J‐Ophtalmol 1973;57:706‐711. - PMC - PubMed
Bach 1997 {published data only}
    1. Bach JF. Tolerance and uveitis. Editorial. Am J Ophtalmol 1997;123:684‐687. - PubMed
Chavis 1992 {published data only}
    1. Chavis PS, Antonios SR, Tabbara KF. Cyclosporine effects on optic nerve and retinal vasculitis in Behcet's disease. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1992;80:133‐142. - PubMed
Elidan 1991 {published data only}
    1. Elidan J, Levi H, Cohen E, Benezra D. Effect of cyclosporine A on the hearing loss in Behcet's disease. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1991;100:464‐468. - PubMed
Gardner‐Medwin 1994 {published data only}
    1. Gardner‐Medwin JM, Smith NJ, Powell RJ. Clinical experience with thalidomide in the management of severe oral and genital ulceration in conditions such as Behcet's disease: use of neurophysiological studies to detect thalidomide neuropathy. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1994;53:828‐832. - PMC - PubMed
Hamuryudan 1990 {published data only}
    1. Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Serdaroglu S, Tuzun Y, Rosenkaimer F, Yazici H. Topical alpha interpheron in the treatment of oral ulcers in Behcet's syndrome: a preliminary report. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology 1990;8:51‐54. - PubMed
Hamuryudan 1994 {published data only}
    1. Hamuryudan V (b), Moral F, Yurdakul S, Mat C, Tuzun Y, Ozyazgan Y, et al. Systemic Interpheron alpha 2b treatment in Behect's syndrome. The Journal of Rheumatology 1994;21:1098‐1100. - PubMed
Hamuryudan 1997 {published data only}
    1. Hamuryudan V, Ozyazgan Y, Hizli N, Mat C, Yurdakul S, Tuzun Y, et al. Azathioprine in Behcet's syndrome: effects on long‐term prognosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1997;40:769‐774. - PubMed
Ince 1996 {published data only}
    1. Ince A, Yacizi Y, Hamuryudan V, Yacizi H. The frequency and clinical characterisitcs of methotrxate (MTX) oral toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a masked and controlled study. Clinical Rheumatology 1996;15:491‐494. - PubMed
Kazokoglu 1991 {published data only}
    1. Kazokoglu H, Saatci O, Cuhadaroglu H, Eldem B. Long‐term effects of cyclophosphamide and colchicine treatment in behcet's disease. Ann Ophtalmol 1991;23:148‐151. - PubMed
Mochizuki 1991 {published data only}
    1. Mochizuki M, Masuda K, Sakane T, Inaba G, Ito K, Kogure M, et al. A multicenter clinical open trial of FK506 in refractory uveitis, including Behcet's disease. Japanese FK 506 Study Group on refractory Uveitis. Transplantation Proceedings 1991;23:3343‐3346. - PubMed
Nussenblatt 1983a {published data only}
    1. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC. Cyclosporine Therapy in the treatment of intraocular inflammatory disease resistant to systemic steroids and cytotoxic agents. Am J Ophtalmol 1983;96:275‐282. - PubMed
Nussenblatt 1983b {published data only}
    1. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Rook AH, Scher I, Wacker BW. Treatment of intraocular inflammatory disease with cyclosporine A. Lancet 1983;ii:235‐238. - PubMed
Nussenblatt 1985a {published data only}
    1. Nussenblatt (a), Palestine AG, Chi‐Chao Ch, Mochizuki M, Yancey K. Effectiveness of cyclosporin therapy for Behcet's disease. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1985;28:671‐679. - PubMed
Nussenblatt 1985b {published data only}
    1. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC. Cyclosporine therapy for uveitis: long‐term follow‐up. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology 1985;1:369‐382. - PubMed
Nussenblatt 1996 {published data only}
    1. Nussenblatt RB, Whitcup SM, de SD, Caspi RR, Kozhich AT, Weiner HL, et al. Intraocular inflammatory disease (uveitis) and the use of oral tolerance: a status report. [Review]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1996;778:325‐337. - PubMed
Nussenblatt 1997 {published data only}
    1. Nussenblatt RB, Gery I, Weiner HL, Ferris FL, shiloach J, Remaley N, et al. Treatment of uveitis by oral administration of retinal antigens: results of a phase I/II randomized masked trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1997;123:583‐592. - PubMed
Sakane 1995 {published data only}
    1. Sakane T, Mochizuki M, Inaba G, Masuda K. [A phase II study of FK506 (tacrolimus) on refractory uveitis associated with Behcet's disease and allied conditions]. Ryumachi 1995;35:802‐813. - PubMed
Simsek 1991 {published data only}
    1. Simsek H, Dundar S, Telatar H. Treatment of Behcet's disease with indomethacin. International Journal of Dermatology 1991;30:54‐57. - PubMed
Wechsler 1988 {published data only}
    1. Wechsler B, Huong LT, Godeau P. Traitement Medical de la Maladie de Behcet. Journal des Maladies Vasculaires (Paris) 1988;13:262‐269. - PubMed
Whitcup 1994 {published data only}
    1. Whitcup SM, Salvo EJ, Nussenblatt RB. Combined cyclosporine and corticosteroid therapy for sight‐threatening uveitis in Behcet's disease. American Journal of Ophtalmology 1994;118:39‐45. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Calguneri 1996b {published data only}
    1. Calguneri M (b), Ertenli I, Kiraz S, Erman M, Celik I. Effect of prophylactic benzathine penicillin on mucocutaneous symptoms of Behcet's disease. Dermatology 1996;192:125‐128. - PubMed

Additional references

Cho 1996
    1. Cho MK, Bero LA. The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Annals of Internal Medicine 1996;124:485‐9. - PubMed
Dickersin 1994
    1. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:1286‐91. - PMC - PubMed
Int Study Group 1990
    1. Anonymous. Criteria for diagnosis of Behcet's disease. International Study Group for Behcet's Disease. [Review] [16 refs]. Lancet 1990;335:1078‐80. - PubMed
Jadad 1996
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12. - PubMed
Landis 1977
    1. Landis R, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159‐74. - PubMed
Moutsopoulos 1994
    1. Moutsopoulos, HM. Chapter 2.90: Behcet's Syndrome. In: Isselbacher KJ, Brunwald E, Wilson JD, et al. editor(s). Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 13th Edition. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 1994.
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995;273:408‐12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms