Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 May;7(3):451-6.
doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.3.451-456.2000.

Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies

A L Bruu et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000 May.

Abstract

Ten microbiological departments in Norway have participated in a multicenter evaluation of the following commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific and heterophile antibodies: CAPTIA Select viral capsid antigen (VCA)-M/G/EBNA (Centocor Inc.), Enzygnost anti-EBV/immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG (Dade Behring), Vironostika EBV VCA IgM/IgG/EBNA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Organon Teknika), SEROFLUOR immunofluorescence assay and EBV Combi-Test (Institute Virion Ltd.), anti-EBV recombinant IgM- and IgG-early antigen/EBNA IgG ELISA (Biotest Diagnostics), EBV IgM/IgG/EBNA ELISA (Gull Laboratories), Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn test (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur), Monosticon Dri-Dot (Organon Teknika), Avitex-IM (Omega Diagnostics Ltd.), Alexon Serascan infectious mononucleosis test (Alexon Biomedical Inc. ), Clearview IM (Unipath Ltd.), and Cards+/-OS Mono (Pacific Biotech, Inc.). The test panel included sera from patients with primary EBV infection, immunocompromised patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection, healthy persons (blood donors), and EBV-seronegative persons. Among the tests for EBV-specific antibodies the sensitivity was good, with only small differences between the different assays. However, there was a greater variation in specificity, which varied between 100% (Enzygnost) and 86% (Biotest). Tests for detection of heterophile antibodies based on purified or selected antigen (Avitex, Alexon, Clearview IM, and Cards+/-OS Mono) were more sensitive than the Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn and Monosticon tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aalto S M, Linnavuori K, Peltola H, Vuori E, Weissbrich B, Schubert J, Hedman L, Hedman K. Immunoreactivation of Epstein-Barr virus due to cytomegalovirus primary infection. J Med Virol. 1998;56:186–191. - PubMed
    1. Elgh F, Linderholm M. Evaluation of six commercially available kits using purified heterophile antigen for the rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis compared with Epstein-Barr virus-specific serology. Clin Diagn Virol. 1996;7:17–21. - PubMed
    1. Hofmann H, Popow-Kraupp T. Diagnosis of EBV infection by means of ELISA. Serodiagn Immunother Infect Dis. 1994;6:135–139.
    1. Høiby E A, Tjade T, Røtterud O J. Evaluation of ten commercial heterophile antibody tests for infectious mononucleosis. APMIS. 1985;93:145–151. - PubMed
    1. Hornef M W, Bein G, Fricke L, Steinhoff J, Wagner H-J, Hinderer W, Sonneborn H-H, Kirchner H. Coincidence of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, cytomegalovirus infection, and rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1995;60:474–480. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources