Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 May;23(5):315-26.
doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230503.

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Affiliations
Review

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

H L Greene. Clin Cardiol. 2000 May.

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias remain a major cause of cardiovascular mortality. Therapy for serious ventricular arrhythmias has evolved over the past decade, from treatment primarily with antiarrhythmic drugs to implanted devices. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the best therapy for patients who have experienced an episode of ventricular fibrillation not accompanied by an acute myocardial infarction or other transient or reversible cause. It is also superior therapy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) causing syncope or hemodynamic compromise. Controlled clinical trials have confirmed the utility of these devices. As primary prevention, the ICD is superior to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients who have survived a myocardial infarction and who have spontaneous, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, a low ejection fraction, inducible VT at electrophysiologic study, and whose VT is not suppressed by procainamide. The effect of the ICD on survival of other patient populations remains to be proven. The device is costly, but its price is generally accepted to be reasonable. The ICD has been a major advance in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gillum RF: Sudden coronary death in the United States: 1980–1985. Circulation 1989; 79: 756–765 - PubMed
    1. Graves EJ: Detailed diagnoses and procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1993. National Center for Health Statistics. 1995; Vital Health Stat 13: 122 - PubMed
    1. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators : A comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near‐fatal sustained ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1576–1583 - PubMed
    1. Mirowski M, Mower MM, Staewen WS, Denniston RH, Tabatznik B, Mendeloff AI: Standby automatic defibrillator. Arch Intern Med 1970; 126: 158–161 - PubMed
    1. Schuder JC, Stoeckle H, Gold JH, West JA, Keskar PY: Experimental ventricular defibrillation with an automatic and completely implanted system. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1970; 16: 207–212 - PubMed