Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Jun;9(3):184-6.

Urinary catheter in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it necessary?

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10803996
Clinical Trial

Urinary catheter in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it necessary?

S K Liu et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the necessity or urinary catheterization in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From April 1996 to April 1998, 261 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a county hospital were randomized to either receive or not receive preoperative urinary bladder catheterization. Data analyzed included age and gender of patients, length of surgery, and intraoperative and perioperative complications such as visceral injury, urinary tract infection, and urinary retention. Our results showed, although not statistically significant, more urinary tract complications in the "with Foley" group than in the "without Foley" group (four vs one, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to length of operation and perioperative complications. There was no visceral injury or operative mortality in this study. We conclude that urinary catheterization can be omitted safely in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources