Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 May;81(5):644-52.
doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90049-2.

Classifying incomplete spinal cord injury syndromes: algorithms based on the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Affiliations

Classifying incomplete spinal cord injury syndromes: algorithms based on the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients

K C Hayes et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 May.

Abstract

Objective: To develop an objective and uniform means for classifying patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) according to SCI syndromes.

Design: Criteria for assigning the syndromes (defined by the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of SCI Patients) were operationalized by means of sensory and motor scores and were incorporated into a set of six independent algorithms and two composite algorithms.

Setting: A regional SCI rehabilitation center in Canada.

Patients: SCI patients (n = 56) with incomplete injuries (American Spinal Injury Association classes B, C, D) and stable neurologic deficits.

Results: Individual algorithms allowed the highest classification rate but with some patients meeting the criteria for more than one syndrome. A composite, differential allocation algorithm, with selected thresholds at decision nodes, yielded a classification rate approximating that of the individual algorithms but without double classifications.

Conclusions: The composite algorithm provided an objective and standardized means of assigning patients to syndromes based on clinically measurable sensory and motor scores. The thresholds used to implement criteria and the order of decision nodes greatly influenced the outcomes and may be adjusted to suit the needs of the classification, that is, embracing liberal or stringent criteria. Controversy remains about the interpretation of some syndromes, and many patients remain unclassifiable because of mixed clinical presentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources