Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1303-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1303.

Comparing health inequality in men and women: prospective study of mortality 1986-96

A Sacker  1 , D Firth, R Fitzpatrick, K Lynch, M Bartley
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing health inequality in men and women: prospective study of mortality 1986-96

A Sacker et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To study prospectively the differences in health inequality in men and women from 1986-96 using the Office for National Statistics' longitudinal study and new socioeconomic classification. To assess the relative importance of social class (based on employment characteristics) and social position according to the general social advantage of the household to mortality risk in men and women.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: England and Wales.

Subjects: Men and women of working age at the time of the 1981 census, with a recorded occupation.

Main outcome measures: Mortality.

Results: In men, social class based on employment relations, measured according to the Office for National Statistics' socioeconomic classification, was the most important influence on mortality. In women, social class based on individual employment relations and conditions showed only a weak gradient. Large differences in risk of mortality in women were found, however, when social position was measured according to the general social advantage in the household.

Conclusions: Comparisons of the extent of health inequality in men and women are affected by the measures of social inequality used. For women, even those in paid work, classifications based on characteristics of the employment situation may give a considerable underestimate. The Office for National Statistics' new measure of socioeconomic position is useful for assessing health inequality in men, but in women a more important predictor of mortality is inequality in general social advantage of the household.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relation between Office for National Statistics' socioeconomic classes and Cambridge score
Figure 2
Figure 2
Age adjusted relative risk of mortality by Office for National Statistics' socioeconomic classes and Cambridge scale for men and women
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Koskinen S, Martelin T. Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1385–1396. - PubMed
    1. Stronks K, van de Mheen H, van den Bos J, Mackenbach JP. Smaller socioeconomic inequalities in health among women: the role of employment status. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:559–568. - PubMed
    1. Soni Raleigh K, Kiri V. Life expectancy in England: variations and trends by gender, health authority and level of deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997;51:649–658. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macintyre S, Hunt K. Socio-economic position, gender and health: how do they interact? J Health Psychol. 1997;2:315–334. - PubMed
    1. Macran S, Clarke L, Sloggett A, Bethune A. Womens socioeconomic-status and self-assessed health—identifying some disadvantaged groups. Sociol Health Illness. 1994;16:182–208.

Publication types