Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Jun;46(6):856-60.
doi: 10.1136/gut.46.6.856.

CO(2) wedged hepatic venography in the evaluation of portal hypertension

Affiliations

CO(2) wedged hepatic venography in the evaluation of portal hypertension

W Debernardi-Venon et al. Gut. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

Background/aims/methods: During hepatic vein catheterisation, in addition to measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), iodine wedged retrograde portography can be easily obtained. However, it rarely allows correct visualisation of the portal vein. Recently, CO(2) has been suggested to allow better angiographic demonstration of the portal vein than iodine. In this study we investigated the efficacy of CO(2) compared with iodinated contrast medium for portal vein imaging and its role in the evaluation of portal hypertension in a series of 100 patients undergoing hepatic vein catheterisation, 71 of whom had liver cirrhosis.

Results: In the overall series, CO(2) venography was markedly superior to iodine, allowing correct visualisation of the different segments of the portal venous system. In addition, CO(2), but not iodine, visualised portal-systemic collaterals in 34 patients. In cirrhosis, non-visualisation of the portal vein on CO(2) venography occurred in 11 cases; four had portal vein thrombosis and five had communications between different hepatic veins. Among non-cirrhotics, lack of portal vein visualisation had a 90% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 94% negative predictive value, and 83% positive predictive value in the diagnosis of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension.

Conclusions: Visualisation of the venous portal system by CO(2) venography is markedly superior to iodine. The use of CO(2) wedged portography is a useful and safe complementary procedure during hepatic vein catheterisation which may help to detect portal thrombosis. Also, lack of demonstration of the portal vein in non-cirrhotic patients strongly suggests the presence of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Iodine venography (A) allowed visualisation of the distal branches of the intrahepatic portal vein while CO2 venography (B) allowed opacification of the whole spleno-mesenteric-portal system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CO2 venography allowed visualisation of the whole spleno-mesenteric-portal system, including the extrahepatic collaterals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Idiopathic portal hypertension. The portal vein is not opacified either on iodine (A) or CO2 (B) venography. Several veno-venous communications are seen.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 1965 Oct;85(4):740-2 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995 Aug;10(2):156-61 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1977 Mar;122(3):623-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dig Dis. 1978 Apr;23(4):302-4 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1981 Nov;141(2):303-9 - PubMed

Publication types