Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group
- PMID: 10808206
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702233
Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group
Abstract
Systemic fungal infections are a major problem in bone marrow transplant recipients who have prolonged neutropenia or who receive high-dose corticosteroids. Prophylaxis with Fluconazole or low-dose amphotericin B reduces, but does not eliminate these infections. To determine which prophylactic agent is better, we performed a prospective randomized study. Patients undergoing allogeneic (related or unrelated) or autologous marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive Fluconazole (400 mg/day p. o. or i.v.) or amphotericin B (0.2 mg/kg/day i.v.) beginning 1 day prior to stem cell transplantation and continuing until recovery of neutrophils to >500/microl. Patients were removed from their study drug for drug-associated toxicity, invasive fungal infection or suspected fungal infection (defined as the presence of fever >38 degrees C without positive culture while on broad-spectrum anti-bacterial antibiotics). Proven or suspected fungal infections were treated with high-dose amphotericin B (0.5-0.7 mg/kg/day). Patients were randomized at each institution and stratified for the type of transplant. The primary end-point of the study was prevention of documented fungal infection; secondary endpoints included fungal colonization, drug toxicity, duration of hospitalization, duration of fever, duration of neutropenia, duration and total dose of high-dose amphotericin B and overall survival to hospital discharge. From July 1992 to October 1994, a total of 355 patients entered into the trial with 159 patients randomized to amphotericin B and 196 to Fluconazole. Patient groups were comparable for diagnosis, age, sex, prior antibiotic or antifungal therapy, use of corticosteroids prior to transplantation and total duration of neutropenia. Amphotericin B was significantly more toxic than Fluconazole especially in related allogeneic transplantation where 19% of patients developed toxicity vs 0% of Fluconazole recipients (p < 0.05). Approximately 44% of all patients were removed from prophylaxis for presumed fungal infection. Proven fungal infections occurred in 4.1% and 7.5% of Fluconazole and amphotericin-treated patients, respectively. Proven fungal infections occurred in 9.1% and 14.3% of related allogeneic marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively, and 2.1% and 5.6% of autologous marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively (P > 0.05). In this prospective trial, low-dose amphotericin B prophylaxis was as effective as Fluconazole prophylaxis, but Fluconazole was significantly better tolerated.
Similar articles
-
Randomized trial of fluconazole versus low-dose amphotericin B in prophylaxis against fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Am J Hematol. 2002 Dec;71(4):260-7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.10234. Am J Hematol. 2002. PMID: 12447954 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous and oral fluconazole for long-term antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. A multicenter, randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):705-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00006. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12729424 Clinical Trial.
-
Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil) vs fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: data of a prematurely stopped clinical trial.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Apr;25(8):879-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702243. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000. PMID: 10808210 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of liposomal amphotericin B in bone marrow transplant.J Postgrad Med. 2005;51 Suppl 1:S49-52. J Postgrad Med. 2005. PMID: 16519256 Review.
-
Antifungal prophylaxis in bone marrow transplant.Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Sep;29(9):921-4. doi: 10.1177/106002809502900915. Ann Pharmacother. 1995. PMID: 8547742 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of voriconazole, fluconazole, and amphotericin B for invasive fungal infections following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Mexico.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Sep 6;10:511-520. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S157642. eCollection 2018. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018. PMID: 30233223 Free PMC article.
-
Network meta-analysis of triazole, polyene, and echinocandin antifungal agents in invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies.BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07973-8. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33853560 Free PMC article.
-
Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD000239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000239.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25188769 Free PMC article.
-
Weekly liposomal amphotericin B as secondary prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies.Med Mycol. 2012 Jul;50(5):543-8. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2011.631152. Epub 2011 Nov 22. Med Mycol. 2012. PMID: 22103347 Free PMC article.
-
Fungal infection-related mortality versus total mortality as an outcome in trials of antifungal agents.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Aug 14;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-40. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006. PMID: 16907965 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical