Digitisation and display of intra-oral films
- PMID: 10808223
- DOI: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600511
Digitisation and display of intra-oral films
Abstract
Aim: To determine the optimal parameters for the digitisation and display of intra-oral radiographs.
Materials and methods: Six intra-oral radiographs (EP size 2 dental film, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY, USA) were digitised using an Arcus II image scanner (Agfa-Gevaert N. V., Mortsel, Belgium). Each film was digitised at 8 bits, with and without a film mask, using three scanner resolutions (200, 400 and 600 p.p.i.), resulting in six versions of each radiograph. Seven experienced observers were asked to evaluate the quality of the resulting images as they were displayed on a Nokia 445Xi monitor (Nokia Display Products, Helsinki, Finland). Monitor settings were varied by changing the colour palette and screen resolution.
Results: Digital images of masked films had a statistically significant (t-test with alpha 2 tail < or = 0.05) higher quality than those scanned without a mask. The best image quality was obtained at a resolution of 400 p.p.i. Display options were optimum with 256 colours and a screen size of 1152 x 864 pixels.
Conclusions: Better results were obtained when intra-oral radiographs were digitised with a mask at a resolution of 200 or 400 p.p.i. and displayed using 256 colours and the largest screen size possible. Further studies are needed to extend these results to other makes and models of scanner and monitor.
Similar articles
-
Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 May;30(3):166-71. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600604. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001. PMID: 11420630
-
Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Mar;29(2):70-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600501. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10808218
-
Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):9-15. Pediatr Dent. 2000. PMID: 10730280
-
A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Jan;29(1):57-60. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600495. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10654038 Clinical Trial.
-
Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997 May;26(3):139-46. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600241. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9442599 Review.
Cited by
-
Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(8):686-90. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/33467269. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22933536 Free PMC article.
-
A Subjective Assessment of Perceived Clarity of Indirect Digital Images and Processed Digital Images with Conventional Intra-oral Periapical Radiographs.J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug;7(8):1793-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5545.3278. Epub 2013 Aug 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013. PMID: 24086916 Free PMC article.
-
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images.J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Feb;15(1):14-7. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000100004. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007. PMID: 19089093 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Sep;40(6):338-43. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/67185962. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21831972 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):102-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/86968802. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21239573 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources