Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction
- PMID: 10809092
- DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200004050-00007
Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in patients undergoing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. All patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps at our institution from February 1, 1989, through May 31, 1998, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index: normal (body mass index <25), overweight (body mass index 25 to 29), obese (body mass index > or =30). Flap and donor-site complications in the three groups were compared. A total of 936 breast reconstructions with free TRAM flaps were performed in 718 patients. There were 442 (61.6 percent) normal-weight, 212 (29.5 percent) overweight, and 64 (8.9 percent) obese patients. Flap complications occurred in 222 of 936 flaps (23.7 percent). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients had a significantly higher rate of overall flap complications (39.1 versus 20.4 percent; p = 0.001), total flap loss (3.2 versus 0 percent; p = 0.001), flap seroma (10.9 versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.004), and mastectomy flap necrosis (21.9 versus 6.6 percent; p = 0.001). Similarly, overweight patients had a significantly higher rate of overall flap complications (27.8 versus 20.4 percent; p = 0.033), total flap loss (1.9 versus 0 percent p = 0.004), flap hematoma (0 versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.007), and mastectomy flap necrosis (15.1 versus 6.6 percent; p = 0.001) compared with normal-weight patients. Donor-site complications occurred in 106 of 718 patients (14.8 percent). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients had a significantly higher rate of overall donor-site complications (23.4 versus 11.1 percent; p = 0.005), infection (4.7 versus 0.5 percent; p = 0.016), seroma (9.4 versus 0.9 percent; p <0.001), and hernia (6.3 versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.039). Similarly, overweight patients had a significantly higher rate of overall donor-site complications (19.8 versus 11.1 percent; p = 0.003), infection (2.4 versus 0.5 percent; p = 0.039), bulge (5.2 versus 1.8 percent; p = 0.016), and hernia (4.3 versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.039) compared with normal-weight patients. There were no significant differences in age distribution, smoking history, or comorbid conditions among the three groups of patients. Obese patients, however, had a significantly higher incidence of preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy than did patients in the other two groups. A total of 23.4 percent of obese patients had preoperative radiation therapy compared with 12.3 percent of overweight patients and 12.4 percent of normal-weight patients; 34.4 percent of obese patients had preoperative chemotherapy compared with 24.5 percent of overweight patients and 17.7 percent of normal-weight patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for flap and donor-site complications while simultaneously controlling for potential confounding factors, including the incidence of preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In summary, obese and overweight patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps had significantly higher total flap loss, flap hematoma, flap seroma, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, donor-site infection, donor-site seroma, and hernia compared with normal-weight patients. There were no significant differences in the rate of partial flap loss, vessel thrombosis, fat necrosis, abdominal flap necrosis, or umbilical necrosis between any of the groups. The majority of overweight and even obese patients who undertake breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps complete the reconstruction successfully. Both such patients and surgeons, however, must clearly understand that the risk of failure and complications is higher than in normal-weight patients. Patients who are morbidly obese are at very high risk of failure and complications and should avoid any type of TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Comment in
-
Radiation therapy in postmastectomy TRAM reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Mar;109(3):1199-200. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00068. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002. PMID: 11884861 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):788-95. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252003.14537.d2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007. PMID: 17312479
-
Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Jun;105(7):2374-80. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200006000-00010. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. PMID: 10845289
-
A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug;122(2):348-355. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d60b0. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008. PMID: 18626349
-
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400. Ann Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 25536199
-
The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jan;115(1):84-95. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005. PMID: 15622237 Review.
Cited by
-
Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):212-21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.08. Gland Surg. 2015. PMID: 26161306 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety and Efficacy of the Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP) Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 11;14(18):4420. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184420. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36139580 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: A systematic review protocol.Int J Surg Protoc. 2016 Oct 11;2:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.isjp.2016.10.001. eCollection 2016. Int J Surg Protoc. 2016. PMID: 31897447 Free PMC article.
-
Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.Hippokratia. 2006 Oct;10(4):153-62. Hippokratia. 2006. PMID: 22087053 Free PMC article.
-
Technique for Minimizing Donor-site Morbidity after Pedicled TRAM-Flap Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes by a Single Surgeon's Experience.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Aug 3;3(8):e476. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000451. eCollection 2015 Aug. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015. PMID: 26495189 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical