Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 May;41(5):874-82; discussion 883-6.

Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10809204
Free article

Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI

E Vallejo et al. J Nucl Med. 2000 May.
Free article

Abstract

Quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) has been used for computation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This study evaluated, first, the effect of injected dose, time of imaging, and background activity on the reproducibility of QGS and, second, the accuracy of QGS, compared with cine MRI, for determining left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions in dogs with and without perfusion defects.

Methods: Sixteen dogs were subjected to either chronic occlusion of the circumflex artery (group I, no perfusion defect) or acute occlusion of the anterior descending coronary artery (group II, perfusion defect). Both groups underwent serial MRI and SPECT.

Results: ( QGS was very reproducible using the automated program (r = 0.99997). Correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 15 and 45 min was poor after the low-dose injection (r = 0.54; SE = 9%) and only fair after the high-dose injection (r = 0.77; SE = 5%). Correlation was poor in the presence of significant background activity (r = 0.36; SE = 12%). Correlation between QGS left ventricular volumes and MRI was good for group I (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.86; end-systolic volume, r = 0.81) and only fair for group II (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.66; end-systolic volume, r = 0.69). The overall LVEF correlation between QGS and MRI was poor (r = 0.51). QGS LVEF (mean +/- SD, 42% +/- 3%) overestimated MRI LVEF (29% +/- 2%).

Conclusion: QGS provides a highly reproducible estimate of LVEF. However, QGS is affected by changes in background activity, time of imaging, and injected dose. In the presence of perfusion defects, QGS overestimated volume relative to MRI. The correlation between QGS- and MRI-derived LVEF was poor in this canine model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Quantitative gated SPECT.
    Germano G, Berman DS. Germano G, et al. J Nucl Med. 2001 Mar;42(3):528-9. J Nucl Med. 2001. PMID: 11337533 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources