Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Dec;51(4):203-9.

[Chronic renal insufficiency and growth retardation: not an inseparable binomial]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10812905
Clinical Trial

[Chronic renal insufficiency and growth retardation: not an inseparable binomial]

[Article in Italian]
G Lama et al. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1999 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate, in children with chronic renal failure and in conservative treatment, the degree to which their growth was compromised, in relation with bone age and with GRF.

Methods: The growth of children (12 F, 14 M) with CRI has been evaluated retrospectively in relation to bone age and GFR. Their mean age at diagnosis was 5.8 years. The pathologies-causing CRI were, in particular, congenital anomalies and hereditary nephropathies. The mean follow-up was 6.1 years.

Results: No significant difference was found between bone age (BA) and chronologic age (CA) (4.7 +/- 3.4 vs 5.7 +/- 3.5 years, p < 0.3) at diagnosis, while it was lightly delayed (8.6 +/- 5.2 vs 11 +/- 5.6 years, p < 0.07) at the end of the study. At diagnosis the mean height SDS for CA was 0.64 +/- 1.12, at the end of observation was -1.2 +/- 1. Only in 3 patients height was < -2DS: two of them underwent rhGH treatment; the third patient had a growth potential exhausted. The mean height velocity (HV) was 6 +/- 4.2 cm/y at diagnosis and 4.8 +/- 3 at last observation (p < 0.3). No significant difference at diagnosis was found between the HV cm/y and GRF stratified for range, at follow-up there was light significant difference between HV and light CRF vs severe (p < 0.02). Likewise no significant relationship between HV and CA was observed. Actually 20 patients are in conservative treatment, 6 received renal transplantation: for them the growth has been proportional to reached renal function and age of receiver.

Conclusions: The conservative therapeutic regimens and good compliance allowed to limit growth deficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources