Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Jun;83(6):634-40.
doi: 10.1136/heart.83.6.634.

The left ventricular dysfunction questionnaire (LVD-36): reliability, validity, and responsiveness

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The left ventricular dysfunction questionnaire (LVD-36): reliability, validity, and responsiveness

C J O'Leary et al. Heart. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a new health status measure (LVD-36) for patients with left ventricular dysfunction which was designed with emphasis on content validity, clarity, brevity, and ease of use.

Design: At baseline, patients completed the LVD-36 and a range of measures reflecting general health and disease severity. The LVD-36 was repeated after one week. After six months, it was repeated again, along with a transition question to measure global changes in health.

Setting: Patients were recruited from the cardiology and general medical clinics at a south west London hospital.

Patients: 60 patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction.

Interventions: None.

Main outcome measures: Short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (LIhFE), New York Heart Association criteria, and exercise performance and echocardiographic tests.

Results: The LVD-36 showed good internal consistency (kappa = 0.95) and repeatability (r(i) = 0.95). Its scores were significantly associated with SF-36 mental and physical component scores (r = -0. 48 and -0.75; p < 0.0001), with exercise capacity (r = -0.52; p < 0. 0001), and with systolic shortening fraction (r = -0.27; p < 0.05). Change in the LVD-36 over six months was associated with change in overall health (F = 5.7; p < 0.001). In tests of validity and responsiveness, the LVD-36 performed similarly to or marginally better than the LIhFE.

Conclusions: The LVD-36 showed a high level of reliability and validity, and appears to measure changes in health. It provides a short, simple, valid, and reliable measure of health status in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of LVD-36 and LIhFE scores.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between the patients' score for global change and change in scores for (A) LVD-36 and (B) LIhFE over six months. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. J Clin Ultrasound. 1979 Dec;7(6):439-47 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1981 Dec;64(6):1227-34 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 1998 Aug;7(6):545-50 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Mar-Apr;4(2):101-7 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Psychol. 1987;28(3):220-5 - PubMed

Publication types