Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1975 Nov;29(5):909-19.

RRBC and EAC rosette formation after DNCB contact sensitization and cyclophosphamide treatment of guinea-pigs

RRBC and EAC rosette formation after DNCB contact sensitization and cyclophosphamide treatment of guinea-pigs

R J Scheper et al. Immunology. 1975 Nov.

Abstract

Rabbit erythrocyte (RRBC) and EAC rosette formation, for detection of T and B lymphocytes respectively, was studied in thymus, lymph nodes and peripheral blood of guinea-pigs. Using two different methods for preparation of RRBC rosette-forming cells (RFC) it was found that, without an incubation period at 37 degrees, a smaller part of the pool of T cells is detected which is particularly sensitive to cyclophosphamide (cy). RRBC rosette formation was studied for 2 weeks after treatment with one high dose of cy and appeared to be minimal in the thymus after 1 week and maximal in the lymph nodes at about day 3. EAC rosette formation was completely blocked by cy treatment. Four days after contact sensitization with 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) no percentual increase was found in RRBC-RFC, suggesting a parallel increase of B and T cells in stimulated lymph nodes. Cytological screening of the rosettes at day 4 after DNCB showed that of the RRBC-RFC approximately 17 per cent were blast cells, while no difference was detected in the number of blast cells participating in EAC rosette formation as compared to the unstimulated lymph nodes. In contrast to RRBC-RFC the percentage of EAC-RFC in draining lymph nodes is increased after contact sensitization. The mechanism of this increase is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Exp Pathol. 1965 Apr;46:147-54 - PubMed
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1974 Jun;53(6):336-44 - PubMed
    1. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1974;47(6):850-63 - PubMed
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1974 Aug;54(2):86-93 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1972 Aug 1;136(2):207-15 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources