Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Mar;73(867):234-41.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.867.10817037.

Imaging liver metastases: current limitations and future prospects

Affiliations
Review

Imaging liver metastases: current limitations and future prospects

P J Robinson. Br J Radiol. 2000 Mar.

Abstract

The diagnosis of liver metastasis relies on imaging. The sensitivity of ultrasound, CT and magnetic resonance techniques for detecting liver metastases can only be assessed in comparison with surgical inspection, intraoperative ultrasound and pathological examination, all methods that are of uncertain accuracy in detecting very small lesions. With current imaging technology, we should detect virtually all liver metastases 2 cm or larger in size, and most of those 1-2 cm in size. Even with optimum imaging, at present we detect only about one-half of metastatic nodules smaller than 1 cm in patients undergoing liver resection and pathological correlation. Improvements in the earlier detection of metastases will probably require a fundamentally different approach from that of conventional anatomical methods. Micrometastases produce alterations in blood flow that may be recognized by radionuclide or Doppler perfusion methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources