Cost-effective management of acute atrial fibrillation: role of rate control, spontaneous conversion, medical and direct current cardioversion, transesophageal echocardiography, and antiembolic therapy
- PMID: 10822039
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00905-x
Cost-effective management of acute atrial fibrillation: role of rate control, spontaneous conversion, medical and direct current cardioversion, transesophageal echocardiography, and antiembolic therapy
Abstract
Management strategies for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) include: (1) the use of intravenous drugs for rate control, (2) drug termination, or (3) direct current (DC) cardioversion. Delays in cardioversion can promote atrial remodeling and add thromboembolic risk. Rate control awaiting spontaneous or pharmacologic conversion may be a cost-effective strategy in patients presenting with recent onset of symptoms. Early DC cardioversion can be cost-effective and minimize antiembolic therapy issues in the acute setting. In patients presenting with AF of unknown or >48 hours' duration, rate control and therapeutic warfarin for 3-4 weeks followed by medical or DC cardioversion is standard practice. However, delays in conversion promote atrial remodeling that makes restoration of sinus rhythm more difficult and increases the likelihood of postcardioversion AF recurrence. Transesophageal echocardiography can identify patients at low risk for a cardioversion-related embolic event and allows cardioversion to be performed earlier, thereby minimizing atrial remodeling.
Similar articles
-
Atrial fibrillation: rate control often better than rhythm control.Prescrire Int. 2004 Apr;13(70):64-9. Prescrire Int. 2004. PMID: 15148984
-
Arrhythmias in the intensive care patient.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003 Oct;9(5):345-55. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200310000-00003. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003. PMID: 14508146 Review.
-
Pharmacologic versus direct-current electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation.Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 4;84(9A):147R-151R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00715-8. Am J Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10568674 Review.
-
A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of sotalol, amiodarone, and digoxin for the reversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation.Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;36(1):1-9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.107655. Ann Emerg Med. 2000. PMID: 10874228 Clinical Trial.
-
[Treatment of atrial fibrillation in a Hungarian hospital department of cardiologic internal medicine at the turn of the millennium].Orv Hetil. 2004 May 9;145(19):1001-6. Orv Hetil. 2004. PMID: 15181735 Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data.BMJ. 2021 Oct 27;375:e066450. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066450. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 34706884 Free PMC article.
-
[Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: when vitamin K antagonists? When aspirin? When heparin? When combinations of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs?].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2009 Jun;20(2):61-9. doi: 10.1007/s00399-009-0046-5. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19543788 Review. German.
-
Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Cardioversion.Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 30;55(10):660. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100660. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019. PMID: 31574989 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Costs and clinical consequences of suboptimal atrial fibrillation management.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:79-90. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S30090. Epub 2012 Mar 26. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012. PMID: 22500125 Free PMC article.
-
Practical compendium of antiarrhythmic drugs: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace. 2025 Aug 4;27(8):euaf076. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf076. Europace. 2025. PMID: 40159403 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical