Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 May;79(5):764-70.
doi: 10.1093/ps/79.5.764.

Efficacy of phase-feeding in supporting growth performance of broiler chicks during the starter and finisher phases

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Efficacy of phase-feeding in supporting growth performance of broiler chicks during the starter and finisher phases

W A Warren et al. Poult Sci. 2000 May.
Free article

Abstract

A feeding regimen has been developed that uses regression equations to predict amino acid requirements over time. Phase-feeding (PF) of broilers was tested to evaluate its efficacy compared with feeding broilers NRC or Illinois ideal chick protein (IICP) recommendations. In Experiment 1, NRC or IICP requirements for lysine, sulfur amino acids, and threonine were fed from 0 to 21 d, whereas PF was tested using a series of three diets (0 to 7, 7 to 14, and 14 to 21 d). No differences (P > 0.05) in weight gain, feed intake, feed efficiency, digestible amino acid intake, or gain per unit digestible amino acid intake were noted among chicks fed NRC, IICP, or PF diets. In Experiment 2, NRC or IICP requirements were fed from 40 to 61 d, whereas PF was tested using a series of three diets (40 to 47, 47 to 54, and 54 to 61 d). No differences (P > 0.05) in weight gain or feed intake were observed, but the feed efficiency of birds fed the IICP diet was decreased (P < 0.05). The IICP and PF diets resulted in decreased (P < 0.05) digestible lysine and threonine intake; gain per unit digestible lysine and threonine intake was increased (P < 0.05) by PF. No differences (P < 0.05) in breast meat, wing, or leg yield were noted among treatments. Economic analysis indicated that PF may facilitate reduced dietary costs without sacrificing growth performance or carcass yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources