Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Jun;22(3):165-9.
doi: 10.1016/s0955-3886(00)00044-8.

The role of in process qualification in quality improvement of the haemonetics MCS plus leucodepleted platelet concentrate

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The role of in process qualification in quality improvement of the haemonetics MCS plus leucodepleted platelet concentrate

J Seghatchian et al. Transfus Sci. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

With the implementation of universal leucodepletion in UK all leucodepletion processes have gone through a standard process qualification and quality improvement. The Haemonetics MCS system is a well established automated platelet collection system for the production of double dose leucoreduced platelet concentrate (WBC approximately 70x10(6)/dose). Recently an automated post collection filtration harness system has been introduced (MCS plus LDP) in which platelets are filtered, using an in-line PALL polyester filter (LRFH6 PALL) to reduce the WBC level to below 5x10(6) WBC/dose. This system passed our Phase I evaluation process based on 20-40 runs. However, some changes in the final volume of the products were needed to conform to national guidelines. Large scale trials using the new volume adjusted protocol revealed occasional failure in the leucocyte content. Therefore, 100% testing had to be implemented on all products. A national evaluation was carried out to determine whether changing the filter to a more efficacious one, the LRFXL (PALL) or slowing the filtration flow rate can influence the overall outcome. To reduce donor variability, known donor population were used with identical apheresis conditions. A more consistent and systematic drop in leucocyte content was observed by reducing the flow rate whereas a similar failure (i.e. 1-3%) rate was found both in controls and LRFXL when using the standard head pressure, which is recommended by the manufacturer. A similar failure rate was found using three different low leucocyte counting technologies (Nageotte, flow cytometry and Imagn 2000). It is recommended that a process qualification/validation program should be implemented when even a small modification in the collection system is introduced.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources