Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic
- PMID: 10832257
- DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0237
Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic
Abstract
Background: The authors compared the safety and efficacy of 4 percent articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 with 2 percent lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000.
Methods: In three identical randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials, subjects 4 to 80 years of age received either 4 percent articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 or 2 percent lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 for simple or complex dental procedures. In each trial, the authors randomized the subjects in a 2:1 ratio to receive articaine or lidocaine. Efficacy was determined by both subject and investigator using a visual analog scale, or VAS. The authors used the Kruskal-Wallis test to analyze the data.
Results: A total of 882 subjects received articaine, and 443 received lidocaine. The authors found no statistical differences between the groups (P = .05). They also compared drug volumes for both articaine and lidocaine groups (2.5 milliliters +/- 0.07 standard error of mean, or SEM, vs. 2.6 mL +/- 0.09 SEM for simple procedures and 4.2 mL +/- 0.15 SEM vs. 4.5 mL +/- 0.21 SEM for complex procedures). The procedures' durations were comparable for both the articaine and lidocaine groups. The authors found no statistical difference between the two treatment groups (P = .05) with respect to subject or investigator pain ratings using the VAS; the mean pain scores determined by both patients and investigators for all groups tested were less than 1.0.
Conclusions: The authors found that 4 percent articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 was well-tolerated in 882 subjects. It also provided clinically effective pain relief during most dental procedures and had a time to onset and duration of anesthesia appropriate for clinical use and comparable to those observed for other commercially available local anesthetics.
Clinical implications: Pain control is a major component of patient comfort and safety. Local anesthetics form the backbone of pain control techniques in dentistry. Four percent articaine with epinephrine is an amide local anesthetic that will meet the clinical requirements for pain control of most dental procedures in most patients.
Comment in
-
Articaine vs. lidocaine.J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Sep;131(9):1248, 1250. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0367. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000. PMID: 10986825 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Feb;132(2):177-85. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0152. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001. PMID: 11217590 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients.Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;22(4):307-11. Pediatr Dent. 2000. PMID: 10969438 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139(9):1228-35. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0338. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008. PMID: 18762633 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of articaine and lidocaine in the pediatric population.J Mich Dent Assoc. 2014 Jan;96(1):34-7. J Mich Dent Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24654413 Review.
-
Anesthetic Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients During Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul 15;42(4):273-281. Pediatr Dent. 2020. PMID: 32847666
Cited by
-
Articaine use in children: a review.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012 Dec;13(6):293-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03320829. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012. PMID: 23235128 Review.
-
Effects of protein binding on a lipid bilayer containing local anesthetic articaine, and the potential of mean force calculation: a molecular dynamics simulation approach.J Mol Model. 2013 Sep;19(9):3831-42. doi: 10.1007/s00894-013-1917-6. Epub 2013 Jun 25. J Mol Model. 2013. PMID: 23798311
-
Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study.Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):356-61. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.171445. Anesth Essays Res. 2016. PMID: 27212774 Free PMC article.
-
Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study.Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):397-403. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.159463. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 26543456 Free PMC article.
-
A spectroscopic assessment of interaction between 4% articaine hydrochloride with adrenaline and various endodontic irrigants.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Sep 7;17(5):347-353. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020. PMID: 33343842 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical