Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1517-20.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517.

Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine

Affiliations

Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine

F Mair et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To review research into patient satisfaction with teleconsultation, specifically clinical consultations between healthcare providers and patients involving real time interactive video.

Design: Systematic review of telemedicine satisfaction studies. Electronic databases searched include Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts and Humanities Citation Index, and the TIE (Telemedicine Information Exchange) database.

Subjects: Studies conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1998.

Main outcome measures: Quality of evidence about patient satisfaction.

Results: 32 studies were identified. Study methods used were simple survey instruments (26 studies), exact methods not specified (5), and qualitative methods (1). Study designs were randomised controlled trial (1 trial); random patient selection (2); case-control (1); and selection criteria not specified or participants represented consecutive referrals, convenience samples, or volunteers (28). Sample sizes were </=20 (10 trials), </=100 (14), >100 (7), and not specified (1). All studies reported good levels of patient satisfaction. Qualitative analysis revealed methodological problems with all the published work. Even so, important issues were highlighted that merit further investigation. There is a paucity of data examining patients' perceptions or the effects of this mode of healthcare delivery on the interaction between providers and clients.

Conclusions: Methodological deficiencies (low sample sizes, context, and study designs) of the published research limit the generalisability of the findings. The studies suggest that teleconsultation is acceptable to patients in a variety of circumstances, but issues relating to patient satisfaction require further exploration from the perspective of both clients and providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Perednia DA, Allen A. Telemedicine technology and clinical applications. JAMA. 1995;273:483–488. - PubMed
    1. Mahmud K, Lenz J. The personal telemedicine system. A new tool for the delivery of health care. J Telemed Telecare. 1995;1:173–177. - PubMed
    1. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Report Number 4. York: University of York; 1996.
    1. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brecht RM, Gray CL, Peterson C, Youngblood B. The University of Texas Medical Branch-Texas Department of Criminal Justice telemedicine project: findings from the first year of operation. Telemed J. 1996;2:25–35. - PubMed

Publication types