Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Jun;34(3):137-68.
doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(00)00048-2.

Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas

Affiliations
Review

Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas

G Nitenberg et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

Malnutrition in cancer patients results from multifactorial events and is associated with an alteration of quality of life and a reduced survival. A simple nutritional assessment program and early counselling by a dietitian are essential to guide nutritional support and to alert the physician to the need for enteral (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN). A daily intake of 20-35 kcal/kg, with a balanced contribution of glucose and lipids, and of 0.2-0.35 g nitrogen/kg is recommended both for EN and PN, with an adequate provision of electrolytes, trace elements and vitamins. EN, always preferable for patients with an intact digestive tract, and PN are both safe and effective methods of administering nutrients. The general results in clinical practice suggest no tumor growth during nutritional support. The indiscriminate use of conventional EN and PN is not indicated in well-nourished cancer patients or in patients with mild malnutrition. EN or PN is not clinically efficacious for patients treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, unless there are prolonged periods of GI toxicity, as in the case of bone marrow transplant patients. Severely malnourished cancer patients undergoing major visceral surgery may benefit from perioperative nutritional support, preferably via enteral access. Nutritional support in palliative care should be based on the potential risks and benefits of EN and PN, and on the patient's and family's wishes. Research is currently directed toward the impact of nutritional pharmacology on the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Glutamine-supplemented PN is probably beneficial in bone marrow transplant patients. Immune diets are likely to reduce the rate of infectious complications and the length of hospital stay after GI surgery. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of such novel approaches in specific populations of cancer patients, and should also address the question of the overall cost-benefit ratio of nutritional pharmacology, and the effect of nutritional support on length and quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources