Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Jun;92(6):1769-76.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200006000-00037.

Single-beat estimation of ventricular end-systolic elastance-effective arterial elastance as an index of ventricular mechanoenergetic performance

Affiliations

Single-beat estimation of ventricular end-systolic elastance-effective arterial elastance as an index of ventricular mechanoenergetic performance

K Hayashi et al. Anesthesiology. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The ratio of ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) to effective arterial elastance (Ea) is known to reflect not only ventricular mechanical performance but also energetic performance. Despite these useful features, technical difficulties associated with estimating Ees make the clinical application of Ees/Ea impractical. We developed a framework to estimate Ees/Ea without measuring ventricular volume or altering the loading condition.

Methods: To achieve this goal, we approximated the ventricular time-varying elastance curve with two straight lines, one for the isovolumic phase and the other for the ejection phase, and characterized the curve with the slope ratio, k, of these two straight lines. Using the concept of the pressure-volume relationship, Ees/Ea is algebraically expressed as Ees/Ea = Pad/Pes (1 + k. ET/PEP) - 1, where Pes is end-systolic pressure, Pad is aortic diastolic pressure, ET is ejection time, and PEP is pre-ejection period. In 11 anesthetized dogs, we recorded arterial and ventricular pressures and ventricular volume and estimated Ees and Ea under various contractile states and loading conditions.

Results: An empirical relation between k and Ees/Ea was found as k = 0.53 (Ees/Ea)0.51. Simultaneous solution of these two equations yielded Ees/Ea as a function of Pad/Pes and ET/PEP. The estimated Ees/Ea values correlated well with the measured Ees/Ea values ([Measured Ees/Ea] = 0.96 [Estimated Ees/Ea] + 0.098, r = 0.925, SEE = 0.051).

Conclusions: The proposed framework is capable of estimating Ees/Ea from ventricular and aortic pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources