Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):228-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF03167674.

Planning factors for developing an enterprise-wide picture archiving and communication system maintenance program

Affiliations

Planning factors for developing an enterprise-wide picture archiving and communication system maintenance program

S Staley et al. J Digit Imaging. 2000 May.

Abstract

Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) maintenance on an individual site basis has historically been a complex and costly challenge. With the advent of enterprise-wide PACS projects such as the Virtual Radiology Environment (VRE) project, the challenge of a maintenance program with even more complexities has presented itself. The approach of the project management team for the VRE project is not one of reactive maintenance, but one of highly proactive planning and negotiations, in hopes of capitalizing on the economies of scale of an enterprise-wide PACS maintenance program. A proactive maintenance program is one aspect of life-cycle management. As with any capital acquisition, life-cycle management may be used to manage the specific project aspects related to PACS. The purpose of an enterprise-wide warranty and maintenance life-cycle management approach is to maintain PACS at its maximum operational efficiency and utilization levels through a flexible, shared, yet symbiotic relationship between local, regional, and vendor resources. These goals include providing maximum operational performance levels on a local, regional, and enterprise basis, while maintaining acceptable costs and resource utilization levels. This goal must be achieved without negatively impacting point of care activities, regardless of changes to the clinical business environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Romlein J, Norton GS, Lyche DK, et al. PACS: Acceptance test, quality control, warranty, and maintenance continuum. Med Imaging, Proc SPIE. 1999;3662:111–119.
    1. Norton GS, Romlein J, Lyche DK, et al. The task allocation chart: Quality control of a picture archive and communication system (PACS) Med Imaging, Proc SPIE. 1999;3662:409–413.

MeSH terms