Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jul;55(7):544-6.
doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.7.544.

A pragmatic assessment of the placement of oxygen when given for exercise induced dyspnoea

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A pragmatic assessment of the placement of oxygen when given for exercise induced dyspnoea

J W Killen et al. Thorax. 2000 Jul.

Abstract

Background: It is uncertain whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) given oxygen for symptom relief should be advised to use it before or after exertion.

Methods: Eighteen patients with smoking related COPD who desaturated on exercise were given oxygen or air from a cylinder in a single blind manner and in an order determined by Latin square randomisation, before and after ascending stairs. The time of ascent, desaturation, and dyspnoea associated with the ascent was compared across the treatment groups.

Results: Oxygen given before or after the ascent reduced maximal dyspnoea from 49.1 mm (95% CI 35.5 to 62.7) to 41.7 mm (95% CI 34.3 to 49.1) of a 100 mm visual analogue scale, reduced desaturation (oxygen before 4.9% (95% CI 3.6 to 6.2), oxygen after 6. 4% (5.3 to 7.5), air before and after 8.2% (6.7 to 9.7%)), but did not affect time of ascent (air before: 5.1 s (95% CI 3.4 to 6.9) reduction from training ascent; oxygen before: 6.1 s (95% CI 2.9 to 9.2) reduction).

Conclusions: Oxygen prescribed for symptomatic relief of dyspnoea benefits selected patients with COPD, but it seems not to matter whether it is taken before or after exertion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Lancet. 1981 Apr 25;1(8226):907-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1984 Nov;67(5):515-9 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1986 Aug;41(8):611-5 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1987 Jun;72(6):693-8 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1988 Jan;43(1):53-6 - PubMed

Publication types