Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1976;53(1):83-106.

Psychosocial aspects of abortion. A review of issues and needed research

Psychosocial aspects of abortion. A review of issues and needed research

R Illsley et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1976.

Abstract

The literature on psychosocial aspects of abortion is confusing. Individual publications must be interpreted in the context of cultural, religious, and legal constraints obtaining in a particular society at a given time, with due attention to the status and availability of alternatives to abortion that might be chosen by a woman with an "unwanted" pregnancy. A review of the literature shows that, where careful pre- and post-abortion assessments are made, the evidence is that psychological benefit commonly results, and serious adverse emotional sequelae are rare. The outcome of refused abortion seems less satisfactory, with regrets and distress frequently occurring. Research on the administration of abortion services suggests that counselling is often of value, that distress is frequently caused by delays in deciding upon and in carrying out abortions, and by unsympathetic attitudes of service providers. The phenomenon of repeated abortion seeking should be seen in the context of the availability and cost of contraception and sterilization. The place of sterilization with abortion requires careful study. A recommendation is made for observational descriptive research on populations of women with potentially unwanted pregnancies in different cultures, with comparisons of management systems and an evaluation of their impact on service users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Calif Med. 1965 Jun;102:407-11 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1964 Dec 12;2(7372):1264-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Jun 1;89:349-55 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1963 Jul 20;2(5350):145-8 - PubMed
    1. N Z Med J. 1961 Oct;60:467-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources