Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7043-50.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043.

Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?

Affiliations

Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?

N C Ellstrand et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Invasive species are of great interest to evolutionary biologists and ecologists because they represent historical examples of dramatic evolutionary and ecological change. Likewise, they are increasingly important economically and environmentally as pests. Obtaining generalizations about the tiny fraction of immigrant taxa that become successful invaders has been frustrated by two enigmatic phenomena. Many of those species that become successful only do so (i) after an unusually long lag time after initial arrival, and/or (ii) after multiple introductions. We propose an evolutionary mechanism that may account for these observations. Hybridization between species or between disparate source populations may serve as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness. We present and review a remarkable number of cases in which hybridization preceded the emergence of successful invasive populations. Progeny with a history of hybridization may enjoy one or more potential genetic benefits relative to their progenitors. The observed lag times and multiple introductions that seem a prerequisite for certain species to evolve invasiveness may be a correlate of the time necessary for previously isolated populations to come into contact and for hybridization to occur. Our examples demonstrate that invasiveness can evolve. Our model does not represent the only evolutionary pathway to invasiveness, but is clearly an underappreciated mechanism worthy of more consideration in explaining the evolution of invasiveness in plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
As genetic distance between mating colonists increases, so too should heterosis in their progeny—up to a point—then, progeny fitness declines as outbreeding depression becomes important.

References

    1. Elton C S. The Ecology of Invasion by Animals and Plants. London: Chapman & Hall; 1958.
    1. Mooney H A, Drake J A, editors. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. New York: Springer; 1986. - PubMed
    1. United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1993.
    1. Horvitz C C, Pacarella J B, McMann S, Freedman A, Hofstetter R H. Ecol Appl. 1998;8:947–974.
    1. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D. BioScience. 2000;50:53–65.

LinkOut - more resources