Comparison of preferences for health outcomes in schizophrenia among stakeholder groups

Abstract

Background: To determine the effectiveness of psychiatric interventions for use in cost-effectiveness analysis, we assessed the feasibility of using a multimedia computer survey to study preferences (utilities) for health outcomes among persons with schizophrenia, family members of persons with schizophrenia, health professionals, and the public.

Methods: We developed videos depicting two patterns of mental health impairment in schizophrenia, both with and without pseudo-parkinsonism side-effects. These descriptions were integrated into a computer program that measured preferences using two psychometric methods: (1) standard gamble and (2) a visual analog scale. This program was used to compare preferences among potential stakeholder groups.

Results: 20 persons with schizophrenia, 11 family members, 20 healthy volunteers and 14 health professionals participated in the computerized interview. All but one subject completed the survey. The correlation among ratings of various states was high (r=0.7-0.95) and ratings were internally consistent in 89% of participants. There were significant differences in values between groups for health states (p=0.024) and in values for the effects of pseudo-parkinsonism on quality of life (p<0.001). Persons with schizophrenia valued the disease states more highly and placed more significance than did other groups on the effects of pseudo-parkinsonism on quality of life.

Conclusions: Computer-based multimedia techniques can offer a feasible and valid approach to measure preferences for outcomes in schizophrenia. The study found significant differences in preferences among stakeholder groups for schizophrenia outcomes. Further work is needed to clarify how these differences affect clinical decision-making and policies for health resource allocation.