Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Jul;84(7):687-91.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.7.687.

In vitro antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis in London

Affiliations

In vitro antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis in London

S J Tuft et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: To document changes in the profile of bacterial isolates from cases of keratitis and changes in their susceptibility to first line antibiotic therapies.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all bacterial isolates from cases of keratitis seen between 1984 and 1999. In vitro laboratory susceptibilities to antibiotics were determined by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The number of isolates, changes in the proportion of bacterial types, and the number that were fully resistant to monotherapy (ofloxacin), dual therapy (gentamicin and cefuroxime), and prophylactic treatment (chloramphenicol) were calculated.

Results: There were 1312 bacterial isolates over 16 years. Gram positive bacteria accounted for 54.7% of isolates and Staphylococcus species (33.4%) were the most frequently isolated organisms. During the study period there has been an increase in the proportion of Pseudomonas species isolates but no overall increase in the proportion of Gram negative isolates. There has not been an increase in the proportion of isolates resistant to ofloxacin since 1995 or an increase in resistance to the combination of gentamicin and cefuroxime. However, since 1984 there has been a significant increase in proportion of Gram negative organisms resistant to chloramphenicol (p=0.0019).

Conclusions: An increase in the in vitro resistance of organisms to first line therapies for bacterial keratitis has not been observed. An increased resistance to chloramphenicol indicates that this drug is unlikely to provide prophylactic cover when Gram negative infection is a risk. Continued monitoring for the emergence of antibiotic resistance is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of total isolates according to Gram stain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of all isolates sensitive and partially sensitive to cefuroxime and gentamicin (solid line). Gram positive (broken line, circles) and Gram negative isolates (broken line, triangles) are shown separately.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of all isolates sensitive and partially sensitive to ofloxacin (solid line). Gram positive (broken line, circles) and Gram negative isolates (broken line, triangles) are shown separately.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of all isolates sensitive and partially sensitive to chloramphenicol (solid line). Gram positive (broken line, circles) and Gram negative isolates (broken line, triangles) are shown separately.

References

    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;121(6):712-5 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1996 Mar;103(3):479-84 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1996 Nov;103(11):1854-62; discussion 1862-3 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov;104(11):1902-9 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):80-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms