Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jul 1;321(7252):13-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7252.13.

Determination of who may derive most benefit from aspirin in primary prevention: subgroup results from a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Determination of who may derive most benefit from aspirin in primary prevention: subgroup results from a randomised controlled trial

T W Meade et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine which groups of patients may derive particular benefit or experience harm from the use of low dose aspirin for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 108 group practices in the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework who were taking part in the thrombosis prevention trial.

Participants: 5499 men aged between 45 and 69 years at entry who were at increased risk of coronary heart disease.

Main outcome measures: Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and stroke.

Results: Aspirin reduced coronary events by 20%. This benefit, mainly for non-fatal events, was significantly greater the lower the systolic blood pressure at entry (interaction P=0.0015), the relative risk at pressures 130 mm Hg being 0.55 compared with 0.94 at pressures >145 mm Hg. Aspirin also reduced strokes at low but not high pressures, the relative risks being 0.41 and 1.42 (P=0.006) respectively. The relative risk of all major cardiovascular events-that is, the sum of coronary heart disease and stroke-was 0.59 at pressures <130 mm Hg compared with 1.08 at pressures >145 mm Hg (P=0.0001).

Conclusion: Even with the limitations of subgroup analyses the evidence suggests that the benefit of low dose aspirin in primary prevention may occur mainly in those with lower systolic blood pressures, although it is not clear even in these men that the benefit outweighs the potential hazards. Men with higher pressures may be exposed to the risks of bleeding while deriving no benefit through reductions in coronary heart disease and stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Boissel J-P. Individualizing aspirin therapy for prevention of cardiovascular events. JAMA. 1998;280:1949–1950. - PubMed
    1. General Practice Research Framework Thrombosis Prevention Trial. Randomised trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at increased risk. A report from the MRC's general practice research framework. Lancet. 1998;351:233–241. - PubMed
    1. Steering Committee of the Physicians Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing physicians study. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:129–135. - PubMed
    1. Cairns JA, Théroux P, Lewis DH, Jr, Ezekowitz MD, Meade TW, Sutton GC. Antithrombotic agents in coronary artery disease. Chest. 1998;114:611–33S. - PubMed
    1. Meade TW, Wilkes HC, Stirling Y, Brennan PJ, Kelleher C, Browne W. Randomized controlled trial of low dose warfarin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at high risk: design and pilot study. Euro Heart J. 1988;9:836–843. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms