Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Jul;52(1):33-8.
doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.106685.

Patterns of endoscopic follow-up after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patterns of endoscopic follow-up after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer

G S Cooper et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic examinations of the colon are often recommended for surveillance following colorectal cancer resection. The actual use and outcome of this testing are not known.

Methods: Five thousand seven hundred sixteen patients 65 years of age or older with local or regional stage colorectal cancer diagnosed in 1991 were identified through the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry. All inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims from 6 months after diagnosis through the end of 1994 were examined to determine use of endoscopic procedures.

Results: One or more colonoscopies were performed in 51%, with an average of 2.9 procedures performed among those tested; sigmoidoscopy was performed in 17%. The rate of colonoscopy was highest during the initial 18 months. Polypectomy was performed in 21% of all patients, and subsequent primary colorectal tumors were diagnosed in 1.3%. Factors associated with colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy use included younger age, survival through follow-up, and geographic region; sigmoidoscopy was also more common in relation to rectal cancers.

Conclusions: There is variability in the use of endoscopic procedures following potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer, with patient-related factors and local practice patterns accounting for the variation. Further studies are needed to elicit the reasons for lack of follow-up and adherence to practice guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources