Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jul 8;321(7253):83-6.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7253.83.

Comparison of intranasal midazolam with intravenous diazepam for treating febrile seizures in children: prospective randomised study

E Lahat  1 , M Goldman, J Barr, T Bistritzer, M Berkovitch
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of intranasal midazolam with intravenous diazepam for treating febrile seizures in children: prospective randomised study

E Lahat et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of midazolam given intranasally with diazepam given intravenously in the treatment of children with prolonged febrile seizures.

Design: Prospective randomised study.

Setting: Paediatric emergency department in a general hospital.

Subjects: 47 children aged six months to five years with prolonged febrile seizure (at least 10 minutes) during a 12 month period.

Interventions: Intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) and intravenous diazepam (0.3 mg/kg).

Main outcome measures: Time from arrival at hospital to starting treatment and cessation of seizures.

Results: Intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam were equally effective. Overall, 23 of 26 seizures were controlled with midazolam and 24 out of 26 with diazepam. The mean time from arrival at hospital to starting treatment was significantly shorter in the midazolam group (3.5 (SD 1.8) minutes, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 3.7) than the diazepam group (5.5 (2.0), 5.3 to 5.7). The mean time to control of seizures was significantly sooner (6.1 (3.6), 6.3 to 6.7) in the midazolam group than the diazepam group (8.0 (0.5), 7. 9 to 8.3). No significant side effects were observed in either group.

Conclusion: Seizures were controlled more quickly with intravenous diazepam than with intranasal midazolam, although midazolam was as safe and effective as diazepam. The overall time to cessation of seizures after arrival at hospital was faster with intranasal midazolam than with intravenous diazepam. The intranasal route can possibly be used not only in medical centres but in general practice and, with appropriate instructions, by families of children with recurrent febrile seizures at home.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of subjects through trial
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time from arrival at hospital to cessation of seizures in children receiving intranasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg or intravenous diazepam 0.3 mg/kg, presented as survival data
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Hirtz DG. Generalized tonic-clonic and febrile seizures. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989;36:375–382. - PubMed
    1. Treatment of convulsive status epilepticus: recommendations of the Epilepsy Foundation of America's Working Group in status of epilepticus. JAMA. 1993;270:854–849. - PubMed
    1. Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, Futterman C, Young GM, Ochsenchlager DW, Waisman Y. A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997;13:92–94. - PubMed
    1. Lahat E, Aladjem M, Eshel G, Bistritzer T, Katz Y. Midazolam in treatment of epileptic seizures. Pediatr Neurol. 1992;8:215–216. - PubMed
    1. Alldredge BK, Wall DB, Ferriers DM. Effect of prehospital treatment on the outcome of status epilepticus in children. Pediatr Neurol. 1995;12:213–216. - PubMed