Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Jul 8;321(7253):88-92.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7253.88.

Intergenerational 20 year trends in the prevalence of asthma and hay fever in adults: the Midspan family study surveys of parents and offspring

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intergenerational 20 year trends in the prevalence of asthma and hay fever in adults: the Midspan family study surveys of parents and offspring

M N Upton et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To estimate trends between 1972-6 and 1996 in the prevalences of asthma and hay fever in adults.

Design: Two epidemiological surveys 20 years apart. Identical questions were asked about asthma, hay fever, and respiratory symptoms at each survey.

Setting: Renfrew and Paisley, two towns in the west of Scotland.

Subjects: 1,477 married couples aged 45-64 participated in a general population survey in 1972-6; and 2,338 offspring aged 30-59 participated in a 1996 survey. Prevalences were compared in 1,708 parents and 1,124 offspring aged 45-54.

Main outcome measures: Prevalences of asthma, hay fever, and respiratory symptoms.

Results: In never smokers, age and sex standardised prevalences of asthma and hay fever were 3.0% and 5.8% respectively in 1972-6, and 8.2% and 19. 9% in 1996. In ever smokers, the corresponding values were 1.6% and 5.4% in 1972-6 and 5.3% and 15.5% in 1996. In both generations, the prevalence of asthma was higher in those who reported hay fever (atopic asthma). In never smokers, reports of wheeze not labelled as asthma were about 10 times more common in 1972-6 than in 1996. With a broader definition of asthma (asthma and/or wheeze), to minimise diagnostic bias, the overall prevalence of asthma changed little. However, diagnostic bias mainly affected non-atopic asthma. Atopic asthma increased more than twofold (prevalence ratio 2.52 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 6.28)) whereas the prevalence of non-atopic asthma did not change (1.00 (0.53 to 1.90)).

Conclusion: The prevalence of asthma in adults has increased more than twofold in 20 years, largely in association with trends in atopy, as measured indirectly by the prevalence of hay fever. No evidence was found for an increase in diagnostic awareness being responsible for the trend in atopic asthma, but increased awareness may account for trends in non-atopic asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson HR, Butland BK, Strachan DP. Trends in prevalence and severity of childhood asthma. BMJ. 1994;308:1600–1604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burr ML, Butland BK, King S, Vaughan-Williams E. Changes in asthma prevalence: two surveys 15 years apart. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64:1452–1456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruce IN, Harland RW, McBride NA, MacMahon J. Trends in the prevalence of asthma and dyspnoea in first year university students, 1972-89. Q J Med. 1993;86:425–430. - PubMed
    1. Haahtela T, Lindholm H, Bjorksten F, Koskenvuo K, Laitinen LA. Prevalence of asthma in Finnish young men. BMJ. 1990;301:266–268. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magnus P, Jaakkola JJK. Secular trends in the occurrence of asthma among children and young adults: critical appraisal of repeated cross-sectional surveys. BMJ. 1997;314:1795–1799. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types