Cost-effectiveness of childhood immunization reminder/recall systems in urban private practices
- PMID: 10888689
Cost-effectiveness of childhood immunization reminder/recall systems in urban private practices
Abstract
Objective: To assess cost and cost-effectiveness of immunization reminder/recall systems in the private sector.
Methods: A manual postcard system (mail) was compared with a computer-based telephone system (autodialer) and control. Costs included time costs and the cost of equipment and supplies. The cost per child and the incremental cost of the intervention relative to control were computed. Cost-effectiveness ratios were computed for return visits and for immunizations delivered.
Results: The average cost per child was $2.28 for the mail group and $1.47 for the autodialer group. The incremental visit cost relative to the control was higher for the mail group ($9.52) than for the autodialer group ($3.48). The autodialer was more cost-effective in delivering immunizations: $4. 06 per extra immunization (autodialer) versus $12.82 (mail).
Conclusions: Excluding start-up costs, the autodialer system was most cost-effective. Including autodialer equipment costs, the autodialer system is more cost-effective only for larger practices.
Similar articles
-
Effect of State Immunization Information System Based Reminder/Recall for Influenza Vaccinations: A Randomized Trial of Autodialer, Text, and Mailed Messages.J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:123-131.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.020. J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32446470 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Collaborative centralized reminder/recall notification to increase immunization rates among young children: a comparative effectiveness trial.JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):365-73. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3670. JAMA Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 25706340 Clinical Trial.
-
Population-based versus practice-based recall for childhood immunizations: a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial.Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):1116-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301035. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Am J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23237154 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: A review.JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1820-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1820. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 11025835 Review.
-
The Contribution of Reminder-Recall to Vaccine Delivery Efforts: A Narrative Review.Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4S):S17-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.02.016. Acad Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33958086 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness of programs to eliminate disparities in elderly vaccination rates in the United States.BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 15;14:718. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-718. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25023889 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to increase pediatric vaccine uptake: An overview of recent findings.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Nov 2;13(11):2503-2511. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1367069. Epub 2017 Sep 26. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017. PMID: 28949819 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomized trial of the effect of centralized reminder/recall on immunizations and preventive care visits for adolescents.Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 9. Acad Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23510607 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Increasing Coverage of Appropriate Vaccinations: A Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun;50(6):797-808. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Feb 1. Am J Prev Med. 2016. PMID: 26847663 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of short message services reminder on childhood immunization programme in Kadoma, Zimbabwe - a randomized controlled trial, 2013.BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:137. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1470-6. BMC Public Health. 2015. PMID: 25885862 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical