Left main coronary artery stenosis: early experience with surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass
- PMID: 10901518
Left main coronary artery stenosis: early experience with surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass
Abstract
Background: To determine the safety of surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in left main stem (LMS) coronary stenosis.
Methods and results: Between October 1996 and April 1998, 67 consecutive patients with a > or =50% LMS stenosis underwent coronary revascularization without bypass (BH) and were compared to a contemporary group of 160 patients revascularized with conventional bypass (CPB). Mean ages in both groups were similar: 63.1 and 64.5 years in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=0.91). Significant triple vessel disease occurred in 40 (80%) and 75 (47.5%) patients in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=NS). Average grafts per patient was numbered 3.1 in BH group and 2.9 in CPB group (p=NS). The perioperative infarction rate (defined arbitrarily as a CK-MB >100 U/l) was 4% (2 patients, excluding 1 preoperative infarct) and 3.1% (5 patients, excluding 2 preoperative infarcts) in groups BH and CPB respectively (p=0.28). Postoperative blood transfusion requirements were less in BH group (19 patients, 38%) compared to CPB group (103 patients, 64.4%), (p=0.04). Postoperative inotropic requirements were similar in both groups; BH group (15 patients, 30%) and CPB group (72 patients, 45%). Mean hospital stay was 6.4 and 7.6 days in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=0.49). The hospital mortality rate was 0% and 3.8% (6 patients) in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=NS).
Conclusions: Our early experience suggests that non-CPB surgical revascularization in LMS stenosis is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass.
Similar articles
-
[Left main coronary artery stenosis and revascularization in the beating heart. Short- and long-term experience].Ann Chir. 1999;53(8):701-5. Ann Chir. 1999. PMID: 10584379 French.
-
Emergency off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting under a beating-heart.Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Oct;5(5):304-9. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999. PMID: 10550716
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB): a strategy for improving results in surgical revascularization.Heart Surg Forum. 1998;1(2):107-10. Heart Surg Forum. 1998. PMID: 11276448 Clinical Trial.
-
[Peri-operative benefits of beating-heart coronary revascularization in patients with triple vessel disease].Ann Chir. 1998;52(8):801-6. Ann Chir. 1998. PMID: 9846432 French.
-
Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: determinants of perioperative morbidity and mortality.Heart Surg Forum. 2001;4(2):152-8; dicussion 158-9. Heart Surg Forum. 2001. PMID: 11550654
Cited by
-
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left main stem stenosis: outcomes, concerns and controversies.J Thorac Dis. 2016 Nov;8(Suppl 10):S787-S794. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.72. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 27942396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Short-term outcomes of off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):852-862. doi: 10.1007/s12055-025-01907-w. Epub 2025 Mar 6. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025. PMID: 40535226
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous