Screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: have we fully explored the possibilities?
- PMID: 10902248
Screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: have we fully explored the possibilities?
Abstract
Genital chlamydial infection is the commonest curable sexually transmitted disease in England and Wales. It is a major cause of pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility. For this reason, research, health promotion, and disease prevention initiatives have focused on women. Screening women for chlamydial infection is concerned mainly with identifying and reducing complications among those already infected (secondary prevention), rather than with preventing new infections (primary prevention). Screening men for genital chlamydial infection, a strategy for preventing new infections in women, has been considered problematic because of the cost, the invasiveness of sampling procedures, and the need to screen in clinical settings. The availability of nucleic acid amplification diagnostic tests challenges these limitations and offers new opportunities for actively including men in disease prevention. This article reviews the arguments for and against screening men for genital chlamydial infection and discusses possible strategies for its implementation.
Similar articles
-
A review on infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Dec;20(6):941-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 24. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006. PMID: 16934531 Review.
-
Non-invasive screening of teenagers for Chlamydia trachomatis in a family planning setting.Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Apr;25(1):11-2. Br J Fam Plann. 1999. PMID: 10228243
-
Is it justifiable to perform screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women?Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):117-25. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2005. PMID: 16082073 Review.
-
Chlamydia trachomatis infections: screening, diagnosis, and management.Am Fam Physician. 2012 Dec 15;86(12):1127-32. Am Fam Physician. 2012. PMID: 23316985
-
Female genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: where are we heading?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 May;285(5):1271-85. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2240-7. Epub 2012 Feb 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012. PMID: 22350326 Review.
Cited by
-
"Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 11;10:325. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-325. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 21070646 Free PMC article.
-
Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Oct;78(5):369-73. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.5.369. Sex Transm Infect. 2002. PMID: 12407243 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):99-103. Br J Gen Pract. 2006. PMID: 16464322 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 30;10:794. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-794. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 21192793 Free PMC article.
-
Young men's views toward the barriers and facilitators of Internet-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening: qualitative study.J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 3;15(12):e265. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2628. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 24300158 Free PMC article.