Phase II clinical trial design for noncytotoxic anticancer agents for which time to disease progression is the primary endpoint
- PMID: 10913809
- DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00058-1
Phase II clinical trial design for noncytotoxic anticancer agents for which time to disease progression is the primary endpoint
Abstract
Phase II evaluation is a critical screening step in the development of new cancer treatments. Historically, anticancer agents have been cytotoxic; they kill existing cells. As such, the primary endpoint for phase II evaluation has been tumor response rate, the percentage of patients whose tumors shrink > 50%. Biotechnology has led to promising new anticancer agents that are cytostatic. In contrast to cytotoxics, these agents modulate tumor environments and/or cellular targets and are expected to delay tumor growth. Phase II evaluation of such agents may instead focus on failure-time endpoints, such as time to disease progression. We examine a phase II trial design that evaluates clinical benefit by comparing sequentially measured paired failure times within each treated patient. Clinical efficacy is defined by a hazard ratio. Assuming patients eligible for a phase II study of a new cytostatic agent have failed previous cancer treatment, their most recent prior time to progression interval, TTP(1), is uncensored. Time to progression after the cytostatic agent, TTP(2), may or may not be censored at analysis. The design is motivated by a "growth modulation index" (TTP(2)/TTP(1)) and the proposition that a cytostatic agent be considered effective if the index is greater than 1.33. A chi(2) test statistic is employed to evaluate the paired failure-time data (TTP(1), TTP(2)). The degree of correlation between the paired failure times is a key feature of this design. Power of the test was evaluated through simulation of trials. Assuming a null hazard ratio equal to 1.0, a trial designed to detect an alternative hazard ratio equal to 1.3, based on accrual of 25 patients/year for 2 years (50 patients total) and with an additional 2 years of follow-up, has 25%, 46%, and 83% power based on correlations of 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7, respectively. These results demonstrate efficiency of the trial design, given moderate to strong correlations between paired failure times.
Similar articles
-
Mixed response and time-to-event endpoints for multistage single-arm phase II design.Trials. 2015 Jun 4;16:250. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0743-9. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26037094 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jul 14. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 16843736 Review.
-
Statistical controversies in clinical research: should schedules of tumor size assessments be changed?Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):1981-1987. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw292. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Ann Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27502711 Review.
-
Design of Phase II cancer trials for evaluation of cytostatic/cytotoxic agents.J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(3):524-9. doi: 10.1080/10543400902802441. J Biopharm Stat. 2009. PMID: 19384693
-
Stopping rules employing response rates, time to progression, and early progressive disease for phase II oncology trials.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 12;11:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-164. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011. PMID: 22151297 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prospective clinical trials of biotherapies in solid tumors: a 5-year survey.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005 Jan;54(1):44-50. doi: 10.1007/s00262-004-0567-z. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005. PMID: 15693138 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives.Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jun 28;42:101035. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101035. eCollection 2022 Aug. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35898197 Free PMC article.
-
The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 May;27(5):516-532. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01667-1. Epub 2025 Mar 29. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40156702 Free PMC article.
-
In search of effective therapies: the current landscape of phase II trials in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):2771-2782. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04149-0. Epub 2022 Jul 1. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 35778653 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive value of clinical judgment of tumour progression in phase II trials.PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052638. Epub 2012 Dec 26. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23300731 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials