Limitations of the transpulmonary indicator dilution method for assessment of preload changes in critically ill patients with reduced left ventricular function
- PMID: 10921545
- DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00008
Limitations of the transpulmonary indicator dilution method for assessment of preload changes in critically ill patients with reduced left ventricular function
Abstract
Objective: We examined whether intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and total end-diastolic volume (TEDV), determined by the transpulmonary indicator dilution technique, adequately reflect preload changes during fluid administration in patients with reduced left ventricular function.
Design: A prospective, controlled, clinical study.
Setting: Medical intensive care unit in a university hospital.
Patients: A total of 18 sedated, mechanically ventilated, and moderately hypovolemic intensive care unit patients, eight with reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction area, 24.9+/-8.0%, group A), ten with normal left ventricular function (ejection fraction area, 57.6+/-13.0%, group B).
Interventions: Continuous crystalloid infusion over 120 mins at a constant rate of 8 mL/kg/30 mins.
Measurements and main results: Stroke volume index, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), TEDV, and ITBV were determined simultaneously at baseline and serially every 30 mins during continuous crystalloid infusion. A similar series of measurements was obtained during control conditions. Performance of various variables during fluid administration was assessed by time correlation analysis. Sensitivity for various variables defined as the ability to detect increasing amounts of administered fluid in individual patients was calculated. All examined variables increased during fluid administration and were unaffected during the control period. Mean time correlation (r2) was significantly higher for pressure monitoring (central venous pressure, r2 = 0.8281; PAOP, r2 = 0.5476) than for volume variables (TEDV, r2 = 0.0256; ITBV, r2 = 0.0729) in group A and was high for all variables in group B (central venous pressure, r2 = 0.7056; PAOP, r2 = 0.6241; TEDV, r2 = 0.49; ITBV, r2 = 0.4225). Sensitivities for central venous pressure, PAOP, TEDV, and ITBV after 120 min were 63%, 75%, 25%, and 25% in group A and 90%, 100%, 60%, and 60% in group B, respectively.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates limitations of the transpulmonary indicator dilution technique for monitoring of intravascular volume in patients with reduced left ventricular function.
Comment in
-
Assessment of myocardial preload in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;29(4):914-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200104000-00054. Crit Care Med. 2001. PMID: 11373500 No abstract available.
-
Significance of volume loading with crystalloids.Crit Care Med. 2001 May;29(5):1091. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00050. Crit Care Med. 2001. PMID: 11378631 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload.J Crit Care. 1996 Dec;11(4):180-8. doi: 10.1016/s0883-9441(96)90029-5. J Crit Care. 1996. PMID: 8977994
-
Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution.Intensive Care Med. 2000 Feb;26(2):180-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340050043. Intensive Care Med. 2000. PMID: 10784306
-
Preload and haemodynamic assessment during liver transplantation: a comparison between the pulmonary artery catheter and transpulmonary indicator dilution techniques.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Dec;19(12):868-75. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502001394. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002. PMID: 12510905
-
[Transpulmonary indicator methods in intensive medicine].Anaesthesist. 1998 Mar;47(3):220-8. doi: 10.1007/s001010050550. Anaesthesist. 1998. PMID: 9567155 Review. German.
-
Emerging trends in minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring and optimization of fluid therapy.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Nov;26(11):893-905. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283308e50. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009. PMID: 19667998 Review.
Cited by
-
Volumetric Monitoring and Extravascular Lung Water in Perioperative Setting and Critically Ill.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Jun;49(3):201-210. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.21382. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021. PMID: 35110139 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac filling volumes versus pressures for predicting fluid responsiveness after cardiovascular surgery: the role of systolic cardiac function.Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R73. doi: 10.1186/cc10062. Epub 2011 Feb 25. Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 21352541 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assess the clinical applicability of transthoracic echocardiography in laparotomy patients in a general intensive care unit.J Res Med Sci. 2014 May;19(5):398-403. J Res Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25097620 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical