The effect of knee flexion angle and application of an anterior tibial load at the time of graft fixation on the biomechanics of a posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee
- PMID: 10921635
- DOI: 10.1177/03635465000280040401
The effect of knee flexion angle and application of an anterior tibial load at the time of graft fixation on the biomechanics of a posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee
Abstract
Ten knees were studied using a robotic testing system under a 134-N posterior tibial load at five flexion angles. Three knee positions were used to study the effect of flexion angle at the time of graft fixation (full extension, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees) and two were used to study the effect of anterior tibial load (60 degrees and 90 degrees). Knee kinematics and in situ forces were determined for the intact ligament and the graft for each reconstruction. Graft fixation at full extension significantly decreased posterior tibial translation compared with the intact knee by up to 2.9 +/- 2.9 mm at 30 degrees, while in situ forces in the graft were up to 18 +/- 35 N greater than for the intact ligament. Conversely, posterior tibial translation for graft fixation at 90 degrees was significantly greater than that of the intact knee by up to 2.2 +/- 1.1 mm at all flexion angles; in situ forces decreased as much as 33 +/- 30 N. When an anterior tibial load was applied before graft fixation at 90 degrees of flexion, posterior tibial translation did not differ from the intact knee from 30 degrees to 120 degrees, while the in situ force in the graft did not differ from the intact ligament at full extension, 60 degrees, and 120 degrees of flexion. These data suggest that graft fixation at full extension may overconstrain the knee and elevate in situ graft forces. Conversely, fixation with the knee in flexion and an anterior tibial load best restored intact knee biomechanics.
Similar articles
-
The position of the tibia during graft fixation affects knee kinematics and graft forces for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):771-6. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290061601. Am J Sports Med. 2001. PMID: 11734491
-
Determination of a safe range of knee flexion angles for fixation of the grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a human cadaveric study.Am J Sports Med. 2007 Sep;35(9):1513-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546507300822. Epub 2007 Apr 13. Am J Sports Med. 2007. PMID: 17435061
-
Reconstruction of knees with combined cruciate deficiencies: a biomechanical study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1768-74. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200309000-00016. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. PMID: 12954836
-
Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;27(6):821-30. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270062501. Am J Sports Med. 1999. PMID: 10569374 Review.
-
Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation--a myth busted?Arthroscopy. 2010 May;26(5):681-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 Apr 8. Arthroscopy. 2010. PMID: 20434668 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2: surgical techniques, outcomes and rehabilitation.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):682-693. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06337-2. Epub 2020 Oct 30. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021. PMID: 33125531 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Nov;9(6):330-6. doi: 10.1007/s001670100230. Epub 2001 Aug 8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001. PMID: 11734868 Review. No abstract available.
-
Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete: an anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review.Sports Med. 2002;32(6):393-408. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232060-00004. Sports Med. 2002. PMID: 11980502 Review.
-
Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears.Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 10;5(4):2325967117700077. doi: 10.1177/2325967117700077. eCollection 2017 Apr. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28451615 Free PMC article.
-
Second-look arthroscopy after double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of patient age.Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2021 Oct 14;26:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2021.10.001. eCollection 2021 Oct. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2021. PMID: 34722161 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical