Importance of the mini-mental status examination in the treatment of patients with brain metastases: a report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 91-04
- PMID: 10924972
- DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00600-3
Importance of the mini-mental status examination in the treatment of patients with brain metastases: a report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 91-04
Abstract
Purpose: Little information is available on the importance of pretreatment Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) on long-term survival and neurologic function following treatment for unresectable brain metastases. This study examines the importance of the MMSE in predicting outcome in a group of patients treated with an accelerated fractionation regimen of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions in 2 weeks.
Materials and methods: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) accrued 445 patients to a Phase III comparison of accelerated hyperfractionated (AH) radiotherapy (1.6 Gy b.i.d.) to a total dose of 54.4 Gy vs. an accelerated fractionation (AF) of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions from 1991 through 1995. All patients had histologic proof of malignancy at the primary site. Brain metastases were measurable by CT or MRI scan and all patients had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of at least 70 and a neurologic function classification of 1 or 2. Two hundred twenty-four patients were entered on the accelerated fractionated arm, and 182 were eligible for analysis (7 patients were judged ineligible, no MMSE information in 29, no survival data in 1, no forms submitted in 1).
Results: Average age was 60 years; 58% were male and 25% had a single intracranial lesion on their pretherapy evaluation. KPS was 70 in 32%, 80 in 31%, 90 in 29%, and 100 in 14%. The average MMSE was 26.5, which is the lower quartile for normal in the U.S. population. The range of the MMSE scores was 11-30 with 30 being the maximum. A score of less than 23 indicates possible dementia, which occurred in 16% of the patients prior to treatment. The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 5 days (range, 0-158 days). The median survival was 4.2 months with a 95% confidence interval of 3.7-5.1 months. Thirty-seven percent of the patients were alive at 6 months, and 17% were alive at 1 year. The following variables were examined in a Cox proportional-hazards model to determine their prognostic value for overall survival: age, gender, KPS, baseline MMSE, time until MMSE below 23, time since diagnosis, number of brain metastases, and radiosurgery eligibility. In all Cox model analyses, age, KPS, baseline MMSE, time until MMSE below 23, and time since diagnosis were treated as continuous variables. Statistically significant factors for survival were pretreatment MMSE (p = 0.0002), and KPS (p = 0.02). Age was of borderline significance (p = 0.065) as well as gender (p = 0.074). A poorer outcome is associated with an increasing age, male gender, lower MMSE, and shorter time until MMSE below 23. Improvement in MMSE over time was assessed; 62 patients died prior to obtaining follow-up MMSE, and 30 patients had a baseline MMSE of 30 (the maximum), and, therefore, no improvement could be expected. Of the remaining 88, 48 (54.5%) demonstrated an improvement in their MMSE at any follow-up visit. Lack of decline of MMSE below 23 was seen in long-term survivors, with 81% at 6 months and 66% at 1 year of patients maintaining a MMSE above 23. Analysis of time until death from brain metastases demonstrated that decreasing baseline MMSE (p = 0.003) and primary site (breast vs. lung vs. other p = 0.032) were highly associated with a terminal event.
Conclusion: While gender and perhaps age remain significant predictors for survival, MMSE is also an important way of assessing a patient's outcome. Accelerated fractionation used in the treatment of brain metastases (30 Gy in 10 fractions) appears to also be associated with an improvement in MMSE and a lack of decline of MMSE below 23 in long-term survivors.
Similar articles
-
A randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus standard in patients with unresected brain metastases: a report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9104.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Oct 1;39(3):571-4. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00341-6. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997. PMID: 9336134 Clinical Trial.
-
Neurocognitive outcome in brain metastases patients treated with accelerated-fractionation vs. accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy: an analysis from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 91-04.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Nov 1;51(3):711-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01676-5. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001. PMID: 11597813 Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic factors in brain metastases: should patients be selected for aggressive treatment according to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jan 15;46(2):297-302. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00416-2. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000. PMID: 10661335
-
A comparison of surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of solitary brain metastases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Apr 1;55(5):1169-76. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04379-1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003. PMID: 12654423 Review.
-
Hyperfractionated and accelerated radiation therapy in central nervous system tumors (malignant gliomas, pediatric tumors, and brain metastases).Radiother Oncol. 1997 Jun;43(3):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)01897-x. Radiother Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9215782 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of brachytherapy in the management of brain metastases: a systematic review.J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Feb;12(1):67-83. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.93543. Epub 2020 Feb 28. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020. PMID: 32190073 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of radiation therapy in palliative care of the patient with cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 10;32(26):2913-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1143. Epub 2014 Aug 11. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25113773 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of limited brain metastases: a single-centre individualized treatment approach.BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 25;12:497. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-497. BMC Cancer. 2012. PMID: 23098039 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective comparison of two cognitive screening tests: diagnostic accuracy and correlation with community integration and quality of life.J Neurooncol. 2011 Nov;105(2):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0595-4. Epub 2011 Apr 26. J Neurooncol. 2011. PMID: 21520004
-
Management of Metastatic Disease in Campania (MAMETIC): An Observational Multicenter Retrospective and Prospective Trial on Palliative Radiotherapy in an Italian Region. Study Protocol.J Pain Res. 2022 Apr 8;15:1003-1010. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S336357. eCollection 2022. J Pain Res. 2022. PMID: 35422656 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical