Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure
- PMID: 10933154
- DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200007270-00012
Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure
Abstract
Background: The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the end stage renal disease (ERSD) population. Older renal transplant recipients experience fewer acute rejection episodes than do younger patients. Despite this, death censored graft survival is no better in these older transplant recipients than in younger recipients. We examined the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database to determine whether recipient age itself has an independent effect on the development of chronic allograft failure (CAF).
Methods: We analyzed 59,509 patients from the files of the USRDS. To determine whether age was an independent risk factor for CAF, the population was analyzed separately for Caucasians, African-Americans, and other ethnic groups. All renal transplant recipients from 1988 to 1997 were examined. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chronic allograft failure as the outcome of interest.
Results: Actuarial 8-year censored graft survival was significantly decreased in the older age groups 67% for ages 18-49 vs. 61.8% for ages 50-64 vs. 50.7% for ages 65+ (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, recipient age was a strong and independent risk factor for the development of chronic allograft failure in Caucasians (RR 1.29 for ages 50-64, RR 1.67 for ages older than 65). These findings were reinforced by an analysis that was restricted to living donor transplants without acute rejection.
Conclusion: In Caucasians increased recipient age is an independent risk factor for the development of chronic renal allograft failure.
Similar articles
-
A decade of experience with renal transplantation in African-Americans.Ann Surg. 2002 Dec;236(6):794-804; discussion 804-805. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200212000-00012. Ann Surg. 2002. PMID: 12454518 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction between donor and recipient age in determining the risk of chronic renal allograft failure.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jan;50(1):14-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50002.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002. PMID: 12028241
-
Association Between Donor-Recipient Biological Relationship and Allograft Outcomes After Living Donor Kidney Transplant.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215718. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5718. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33847748 Free PMC article.
-
Living donors >55 years: to use or not to use?Transplantation. 1999 Apr 15;67(7):999-1004. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199904150-00011. Transplantation. 1999. PMID: 10221484
-
The UNOS renal transplant registry.Clin Transpl. 2001:1-18. Clin Transpl. 2001. PMID: 12211771
Cited by
-
[Management of older patients following solid organ transplantation].Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jan;49(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0993-x. Epub 2015 Dec 9. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016. PMID: 26650035 Review. German.
-
Immunosenescence and immune response in organ transplantation.Int Rev Immunol. 2014 May-Jun;33(3):162-73. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2013.829469. Epub 2013 Oct 15. Int Rev Immunol. 2014. PMID: 24127845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prolonged graft survival in older recipient mice is determined by impaired effector T-cell but intact regulatory T-cell responses.PLoS One. 2010 Feb 16;5(2):e9232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009232. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20169060 Free PMC article.
-
Age-associated decrease in de novo donor-specific antibodies in renal transplant recipients reflects changing humoral immunity.Immun Ageing. 2019 May 9;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12979-019-0149-8. eCollection 2019. Immun Ageing. 2019. PMID: 31168309 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced significance of donor-recipient age gradient as a prognostic factor of graft outcome in living donor kidney transplantation.World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1718-26. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2038-1. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23571866
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical