Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1975 May;20(5):397-406.
doi: 10.1007/BF01070783.

Computer-aided diagnosis of "dyspepsia"

Computer-aided diagnosis of "dyspepsia"

J C Horrocks et al. Am J Dig Dis. 1975 May.

Abstract

Experience with computer-aided diagnosis of "dyspepsia" in a consecutive prospective series of 212 patients coming to surgery is described. Analysis is concentrated upon 122 patients who presented to an outpatient clinic de novo for diagnosis. During their first (outpatient) hospital contact, a firm diagnosis was made in just over half of these patients (though where made, it was usually correct). After full investigation, the diagnostic accuracy (prior to operation) was 92.6%. Using data elicited solely from the house surgeon's interview at the time of admission, the computer's overall diagnostic accuracy was 87.7%. The cost of each new computer diagnosis was around 25 new pence ($0.60). and the time taken was about 5 minutes. In a further small series designed to discriminate between organic and functional dyspepsia, the computer correctly assigned all but 1 of 23 patients with organic disease to the correct disease category. However, almost half of 33 patients with x-ray negative dyspepsia were predicted by the computer to have organic lesions. Time alone will tell whether the computer is a better early predictor of eventual organic disease than currently available radiologic methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Med J. 1973 Apr 21;2(5859):161-5 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1972 Dec 2;4(5839):519-20 - PubMed
    1. Methods Inf Med. 1974 Apr;13(2):83-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1972 Nov 11;4(5836):350-4 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1968 Feb 24;1(5590):502-4 - PubMed