Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Feb;19(1):32-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF03028809.

Cyclophosphamide in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cyclophosphamide in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study

L La Mantia et al. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1998 Feb.

Abstract

No effective treatment is presently available for progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Cyclophosphamide (CFX), a cytotoxic immunosuppressive drug widely used in systemic dysimmune diseases, has been proposed for the treatment of multiple sclerosis with different schedules and controversial results. To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of CFX, we compared three different treatment schedules in patients with progressive MS: induction followed by bimonthly boosters for one year (17 patients); bimonthly boosters for one year without previous induction (15 patients); and monthly boosters for one year (21 patients). Survival analysis showed that the percentage of stable patients was significantly higher in the first and third treatment schedule groups. Myelotoxicity occurred in patients treated with induction and boosters (Group A). A high incidence of broncopneumonia was observed in patients undergoing the second treatment schedule (Group B). No major effects were observed in patients treated with monthly boosters (Group C). Response to treatment was limited to secondary progressive form. This study suggests that monthly treatment with CFX might be safely administered in progressive MS patients; its clinical efficacy must be confirmed by an appropriately designed clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1107-12 - PubMed
    1. Arch Neurol. 1988 Jan;45(1):27-30 - PubMed
    1. Lyon Med. 1966 Feb 6;215(6):345-52 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol. 1980;223(3):177-90 - PubMed
    1. Br Med Bull. 1977 Jan;33(1):4-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms