A comparative investigation of contraceptive reliability, cycle control and tolerance of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone or desogestrel
- PMID: 10943575
- DOI: 10.1080/13625180008500387
A comparative investigation of contraceptive reliability, cycle control and tolerance of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone or desogestrel
Erratum in
- Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001 Mar;6(1):63
Abstract
Objective: To assess the contraceptive reliability, cycle control and tolerance of a new monophasic oral contraceptive (Yasmin) containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone and compare it with a preparation containing an equal dose of ethinylestradiol combined with 150 microg desogestrel (Marvelon).
Methods: A multicenter, open-label, randomized study was carried out in 26 European centers. Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control and tolerance (including body weight, blood pressure and heart rate) were assessed over 26 cycles, plus a 3-month follow-up period.
Results: Of 900 women who were randomized, 887 started treatment and 627 completed the 26 cycles plus follow-up (310 in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone group and 317 in the ethinylestradiol/desogestrel group). Both study preparations were found to be effective with regard to contraceptive reliability and cycle control was good. There were six pregnancies (three in each group), but none were considered to have been the result of method failures. The subjective and objective tolerances were good in both groups. A statistically significant difference was found in body weight changes between the two groups. While there was an increase in mean body weight in the ethinylestradiol/desogestrel group from cycle 5 onward, the mean body weight per cycle in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone group was slightly below the baseline value throughout the study. The incidence ofpremenstrual symptoms was higher in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone group than in the ethinylestradiol/desogestrel group during the 6 months prior to the study, but lower during treatment. The rates ofdysmenorrhea were identical under both treatments but the symptoms were more often mild and less often severe in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone group.
Conclusion: The combination of 30 microg ethinylestradiol combined with 3 mg drospirenone provides effective oral contraception and good cycle control, and is well tolerated. Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone had a more favorable effect on body weight than ethinylestradiol/desogestrel, with the mean body weight remaining lower than baseline for the majority of the women.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Mar;5(1):25-34. doi: 10.1080/13625180008500375. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000. PMID: 10836660 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and acceptability of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and either desogestrel or gestodene.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1998 Sep;3(3):113-20. doi: 10.3109/13625189809051413. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1998. PMID: 9853201 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized study over 13 cycles to assess the influence of oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol combined with drospirenone or desogestrel on carbohydrate metabolism.Contraception. 2003 Jun;67(6):423-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00537-1. Contraception. 2003. PMID: 12814810 Clinical Trial.
-
The contraceptive profile of a new oral contraceptive with antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic effects.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Dec;5 Suppl 3:25-33. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000. PMID: 11246599 Review.
-
Added benefits of drospirenone for compliance.Climacteric. 2005 Oct;8 Suppl 3:28-34. doi: 10.1080/13697130500330309. Climacteric. 2005. PMID: 16203653 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol with either drospirenone or levonorgestrel on various parameters associated with well-being in healthy women: a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study.Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(5):325-36. doi: 10.2165/11535450-000000000-00000. Clin Drug Investig. 2010. PMID: 20384388 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 31;7(7):CD002120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002120.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37523477 Free PMC article.
-
The role of hormones and hormonal treatments in premenstrual syndrome.CNS Drugs. 2003;17(5):325-42. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317050-00003. CNS Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12665391 Review.
-
Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):CD006586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006586.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37365881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contraceptive options for women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder: current insights and a narrative review.Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Aug 25;7:117-125. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S97013. eCollection 2016. Open Access J Contracept. 2016. PMID: 29386943 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources