Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jun;26(6):693-7.
doi: 10.1007/s001340051234.

CO assessment by suprasternal Doppler in critically ill patients: comparison with thermodilution

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

CO assessment by suprasternal Doppler in critically ill patients: comparison with thermodilution

J Y Lefrant et al. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of suprasternal Doppler (SST) and thermodilution (TD) for the measurement of cardiac output (CO) in critically ill patients.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Patients and participants: 65 consecutive critically ill patients requiring a pulmonary artery catheter.

Interventions: Paired CO measurements were made simultaneously using SST and TD by two independent operators. The time to obtain a CO value by SST was measured. Correlation coefficients and the linear regression equation were determined. A Bland and Altman diagram was plotted. A Bland and Altman diagram was also plotted for the level of cardiac index (CI) values (low: CI < 2.5 l min(-1) m(-2); normal: 2.5 < or = CI < or = 4.5 l min(-1) m(-2); high: CI > 4.5 l min(-1) m(-2)).

Measurements and results: In seven patients SST failed to measure CO. In the remaining 58 patients 314 paired CO measurements were performed. The mean time to measure CO by SST was 73 +/- 45 s. The equation of linear regression was: SST(CO) = 0.84 TD(CO) + 1.39. The correlation coefficient was 0.84. The bias between SST and TD was -0.2 +/- 1.4 l min(-1). Biases were -0.23 +/- 0.50, -0.20 +/- 0.68, and 0.25 +/- 0.92 l min(-1) m(-2) for low, normal, and high levels of CI, respectively.

Conclusion: SST does not accurately measure CO but allows a rapid assessment of CI level in critically ill patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources