Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Sep;93(1):197-200.
doi: 10.1006/jsre.2000.5968.

Trauma mannequin assessment of management skills of surgical residents after advanced trauma life support training

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Trauma mannequin assessment of management skills of surgical residents after advanced trauma life support training

J Ali et al. J Surg Res. 2000 Sep.

Abstract

Background: We tested the effectiveness of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training among surgical residents using a specially designed mannequin.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two Postgraduate Year I surgical residents were randomly assigned to two groups of 16 each. By use of a trauma mannequin, the 32 residents' performances were scored using four trauma scenarios before 16 residents (ATLS group) completed a standard ATLS course. Performances were also scored after the ATLS course on another four trauma scenarios. The scores were standardized to a maximum of 20 for each scenario. Organized Approach scores with a range of 1 to 5, Priority scores ranging from 1 to 7, and global ratings of Honors, Pass, Borderline, or Fail were assigned for each clinical scenario.

Results: The pre-ATLS assessment scores were similar for both groups ranging between 9.4 +/- 3.5 and 11.4 +/- 2.9 for the ATLS group and between 10.2 +/- 3.8 and 11.4 +/- 3.9 for the non-ATLS group. The ATLS group scores ranged from 16.0 +/- 1.3 to 17.4 +/- 3.1 after the course and the non-ATLS group scores ranged from 11.4 +/- 4.2 to 12.9 +/- 4.0 (P < 0.05). Pre-ATLS Organized Approach scores were 2.9 +/- 1.0 and 2.7 +/- 1.1 (NS) for the ATLS and non-ATLS groups, respectively, with post-ATLS scores being significantly higher in the ATLS group (4.9 +/- 1.2 compared with 2.8 +/- 1.2 for the non-ATLS group, P < 0. 05). Initial Priority scores were also similar for both groups (3.2 +/- 1.4 for the ATLS group and 3.3 +/- 2.0 for the non-ATLS group). Post-ATLS Priority scores were significantly higher (6.4 +/- 1.4) in the ATLS group compared with 4.2 +/- 1.9 for the non-ATLS group (P < 0.05). The pre-ATLS global ratings were similar for both groups and post-ATLS there were 10 Honors ratings in the ATLS group and none for the control group.

Conclusions: Using a trauma mannequin, for assessment, surgical residents completing the ATLS course demonstrated superior resuscitation skills compared with a non-ATLS group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Trauma training in simulation: translating skills from SIM time to real time.
    Knudson MM, Khaw L, Bullard MK, Dicker R, Cohen MJ, Staudenmayer K, Sadjadi J, Howard S, Gaba D, Krummel T. Knudson MM, et al. J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):255-63; discussion 263-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816275b0. J Trauma. 2008. PMID: 18301184 Clinical Trial.
  • Comparing the standardized live trauma patient and the mechanical simulator models in the ATLS initial assessment station.
    Ali J, Dunn J, Eason M, Drumm J. Ali J, et al. J Surg Res. 2010 Jul;162(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.02.029. Epub 2010 Mar 19. J Surg Res. 2010. PMID: 20452620
  • [ATLS course for surgery residents--should it be mandatory?].
    Ben-Abraham R, Stein M, Kluger Y, Paret G, Rivkind A, Shemer J. Ben-Abraham R, et al. Harefuah. 1997 Dec 15;133(12):659-60, 662. Harefuah. 1997. PMID: 9451884 Hebrew.
  • Advanced trauma life support, 8th edition, the evidence for change.
    Kortbeek JB, Al Turki SA, Ali J, Antoine JA, Bouillon B, Brasel K, Brenneman F, Brink PR, Brohi K, Burris D, Burton RA, Chapleau W, Cioffi W, Collet e Silva Fde S, Cooper A, Cortes JA, Eskesen V, Fildes J, Gautam S, Gruen RL, Gross R, Hansen KS, Henny W, Hollands MJ, Hunt RC, Jover Navalon JM, Kaufmann CR, Knudson P, Koestner A, Kosir R, Larsen CF, Livaudais W, Luchette F, Mao P, McVicker JH, Meredith JW, Mock C, Mori ND, Morrow C, Parks SN, Pereira PM, Pogetti RS, Ravn J, Rhee P, Salomone JP, Schipper IB, Schoettker P, Schreiber MA, Smith RS, Svendsen LB, Taha W, van Wijngaarden-Stephens M, Varga E, Voiglio EJ, Williams D, Winchell RJ, Winter R. Kortbeek JB, et al. J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1638-50. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181744b03. J Trauma. 2008. PMID: 18545134 Review.
  • Advanced trauma life support.
    Gwinnutt CL, Driscoll PA. Gwinnutt CL, et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1996 Mar;13(2):95-101. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1996.00939.x. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1996. PMID: 8829950 Review.

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources