Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping
- PMID: 10946587
- DOI: 10.1007/pl00008172
Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping
Abstract
Wing and Kristofferson (1973) have shown that temporal precision in self-paced tapping is limited by variability in a central timekeeper and by variability arising in the peripheral motor system. Here we test an extension of the Wing-Kristofferson model to synchronization with periodic external events that was proposed by Vorberg and Wing (1994). In addition to the timekeeper and motor components, a linear phase correction mechanism is assumed which is triggered by the last or the last two synchronization errors. The model is tested in an experiment that contrasts synchronized and self-paced trapping, with response periods ranging from 200-640 ms. The variances of timekeeper and motor delays and the error correction parameters were estimated from the auto-covariance functions of the inter-response intervals in continuation and the asynchronies in synchronization. Plausible estimates for all parameters were obtained when equal motor variance was assumed for synchronization and continuation. Timekeeper variance increased with metronome period, but more steeply during continuation than during synchronization, suggesting that internal timekeeping processes are stabilized by periodic external signals. First-order error correction became more important as the metronome period increased, whereas the contribution of second-order error correction decreased. It is concluded that the extended two-level model accounts well for both synchronization and continuation performance.
Similar articles
-
The transition from synchronization to continuation tapping.Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Aug;24(4):465-83. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Oct 4. Hum Mov Sci. 2005. PMID: 16213045
-
Time in motion: effects of whole-body rotatory accelerations on timekeeping processes.Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1842-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 19. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 20227429
-
Unraveling the finding of 1/f beta noise in self-paced and synchronized tapping: a unifying mechanistic model.Biol Cybern. 2008 Aug;99(2):159-70. doi: 10.1007/s00422-008-0247-8. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Biol Cybern. 2008. PMID: 18679707
-
The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences.Exp Brain Res. 1996 Jun;110(1):117-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00241381. Exp Brain Res. 1996. PMID: 8817263
-
Temporal control and motor control: two functional modules which may be influenced differently under microgravity.Hum Mov Sci. 1998 Jan;17(1):77-93. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(97)00025-0. Hum Mov Sci. 1998. PMID: 11543514
Cited by
-
Influence of Pacing by Periodic Auditory Stimuli on Movement Continuation: Comparison with Self-regulated Periodic Movement.J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1141-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1141. Epub 2013 Oct 20. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013. PMID: 24259932 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-feedback with Partner Contributes to Performance Accuracy in Finger-tapping Rhythm Synchronization between One Leader and Two Followers.Sci Rep. 2019 May 24;9(1):7800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43352-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31127127 Free PMC article.
-
A general procedure to measure the pacing of body movements timed to music and metronome in younger and older adults.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 5;11(1):3264. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82283-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33547366 Free PMC article.
-
Intrinsic Rhythmicity Predicts Synchronization-Continuation Entrainment Performance.Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 6;8(1):11782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29267-z. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30082734 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Timing continuous or discontinuous movements across effectors specified by different pacing modalities and intervals.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;220(3-4):335-47. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3142-4. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22710620
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources